Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Chaos Frank does it again…

False Pope calls for Sodomite Civil Unions, wants Children of Gay Couples to be Raised in Church

[UPDATE 22-OCT-20 00:30 UTC: Video snippet of Francis’ comments now included – scroll down!]

By now you’ve probably already heard about it: The Jesuit apostate Jorge Bergoglio, better known by his pseudonym “Pope Francis”, has publicly called for civil unions for sodomite couples — a type of legal substitute for “gay marriage” — and then some.

Bergoglio’s statements became public today at the release of the new movie Francesco by Russian-born Jewish producer Evgeny Afineevsky. The biopic “tells the story of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and tackles some of the main themes of his pontificate through a series of interviews”, Vatican News reports. The movie premiered today, Oct. 21, at the Rome Film Festival.

According to a report by Catholic News Agency, Francis’ controversial remarks consist of the following:

Homosexuals have a right to be a part of the family. They’re children of God and have a right to a family. Nobody should be thrown out, or be made miserable because of it…. What we have to create is a civil union law. That way they are legally covered. I stood up for that.

(“Pope” Francis in Francesco; quoted in “Pope Francis calls for civil union law for same-sex couples, in shift from Vatican stance”, Catholic News Agency, Oct. 21, 2020.)

A video clip that shows Francis saying some of these words, ostensibly taken from the Francesco documentary, has emerged online (see it here).

As bad as that is, the film reportedly reveals something else Francis said that is even worse:

The film addresses the pastoral outreach of Pope Francis to those who identify as LGBT, including a story of the pontiff encouraging two Italian men in a same-sex relationship to raise their children in their parish church, which, one of the men said, was greatly beneficial to his children.

“He didn’t mention what was his opinion on my family. Probably he’s following the doctrine on this point,” the man said, while praising the pope for a disposition and attitude of welcome and encouragement.

(“Pope Francis calls for civil union law for same-sex couples, in shift from Vatican stance”, Catholic News Agency, Oct. 21, 2020; underlining added.)

Ladies and gentlemen, this is Bergoglian “accompaniment” on steroids. Regardless of whatever verbal disavowals may be given alongside it, this is the factual acceptance of sodomy and sodomitical unions and “families” by the Vatican II Sect, and everyone knows it.

It will not do, as some diehard Novus Ordos will surely now attempt, to dismiss this on the ground that this is a “pastoral approach” and not a statement of doctrine. The Catholic Church cannot condone in practice what she condemns in theory. That wouldn’t be being pastoral, it would be being hypocritical.

Bergoglio’s position on this is an application of Amoris Laetitia: Don’t try to convert the sinner, simply accompany him — on the way to hell! This may be advanced under the pretext that it is just a provisional arrangement, albeit indefinite but de facto it is the acceptance of mortal sin. This won’t stop the Novus Ordo apologist, however, from harping on some technicality to get Bergoglio off the hook.

The web site Rome Reports has put together the following brief video clip on the Frankster’s latest explosive remarks:

The false pope in Rome has moved far beyond the “mere” acceptance of sodomites as sodomites. He has now arrived at promoting the idea of sodomite families. His comments are ambiguous enough to allow Tim Staples, Jimmy Akin, and the rest of the Novus Ordo apologist gang to argue that he is talking about sodomites’ families in the sense of parents, siblings, grandparents, and aunts and uncles.

However, that flies straight in the face of the other bombshell the film Francesco has dropped, namely, Francis “encouraging two Italian men in a same-sex relationship to raise their children in their parish church….” That constitutes de facto acceptance of sodomites as parents of children and as comprising a family together with them. Bergoglio is making Sodom and Gomorrah look like amateur hour!

Francis’ remarks mean that before long, the following will not be an unusual sight at Novus Ordo parishes:

Embed from Getty Images

Coming soon, to a fake “Catholic” parish near you!

Has Mark Shea already notified Elton John and David Furnish and “their” children?!

The long-term scandal this will cause, especially to innocent little souls, defies imagination. Our Blessed Lord had a most somber warning for those who harm children: “But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea” (Mt 18:6). And the soul is more precious than the body: “And fear ye not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him that can destroy both soul and body in hell” (Mt 10:28).

The report by Catholic News Agency goes on to point out that Francis’ position is in diametrical contradiction to the Vatican’s previous stance even under John Paul II and Benedict XVI. Needless to say, Hellboy James Martin is ecstatic.

Francis’ position on same-sex civil unions had actually been divulged before, but presumably not everyone was willing to believe it because it had been part of a private conversation behind closed doors. As “Archbishop” of Buenos Aires, he had taken the same stance, not surprisingly. Talk about a hermeneutic of continuity!

Promotional trailer for Francesco

Francis has quite a history when it comes to his approach to homosexuality. It all began, more or less, on July 29, 2013. On that day the news broke that Francis had shrugged off sodomites’ unnatural sexual appetite with the now infamous “Who am I to judge?”. At the time, a lot of people expressed outrage or at least raised eyebrows. Naturally, the Novus Ordo Sect’s apologists rushed to the defense of their man, explaining that it was all a misunderstanding due to a poor choice of words, etc.

But that was over seven years ago, and a lot of water has flowed down the Tiber since then. In the meantime, so much has happened to shed light on what may have been obscure at first that only a malicious man or an utter fool would not be able to see the writing on the wall. Here’s a quick review of some major milestones, in chronological order:

The picture that emerges from these stories is quite clear, and we have by far not listed everything we could have. Beyond that, Bergoglio’s support for sodomite civil unions specifically has long been an open secret:

Francis’ words in Francesco, quoted above, that no sodomite should be excluded, is diametrically opposed to Sacred Scripture:

But now I have written to you, not to keep company, if any man that is named a brother, be a fornicator, or covetous, or a server of idols, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner: with such a one, not so much as to eat. For what have I to do to judge them that are without? Do not you judge them that are within? For them that are without, God will judge. Put away the evil one from among yourselves.

(1 Corinthians 5:11-13)

What will the conservative Novus Ordos and the semi-traditionalists do now? (Of course “Abp.” Carlo Maria Viganò has already weighed in.) They find themselves in a corner, because if they are logically consistent with their own argumentation, then these latest remarks by Chaos Frank still shouldn’t make a difference to anything. As before, they can simply appeal to them not being infallible, not being doctrinal but practical, etc. If none of Bergoglio’s many heresies or blasphemies have moved them before, why should this latest affront to Catholic Faith and morals be any different?

On the other hand, if the semi-trads now start questioning the validity of Francis’ claim to being the Pope on account of what has just been revealed, they will not be logically consistent, since what he has said before is just as bad or even worse. In other words, they would now have to reject their prior position as untenable. Let us hope that they finally will; but disavowing something one has long held and defended, comes at the price of sacrificing one’s pride, and that is not easy for fallen human nature to do.

As for the Bergoglio admirers at the so-called Where Peter Is… web site, we are making the following prediction: They will (a) praise Francis for his accompaniment of the marginalized; (b) justify it as the right and compassionate thing to do, in light of the complexity of current circumstances, which have changed significantly since the days of John Paul II; and (c) argue that Francis is essentially “counseling the lesser sin” in calling for the legalization of same-sex civil unions, as it is (so they will claim) the only politically viable way to prevent “homosexual marriage.”

At this point, however, that would be a distinction without a difference. Call it whatever you like — at the end of the day, the externally observable result will be the same: sodomite couples happily raising children and being accepted as a “family” — at church, no less!

The label put on that arrangement simply won’t matter anymore.

Image sources: composite with elements from shutterstock.com
Licenses: paid