Francis gets a Thumbs-Up from Hell’s Apostle:

Apostate Hans Kung “Extremely Delighted” with Election of Bergoglio as “Pope” Francis

Apostate “theologian” Hans Kung, peritus at Vatican II but eventually censured even by the New Church, denies practically every dogma in the book, from papal infallibility to the Most Holy Trinity. Despite having had his teaching license revoked by the Novus Ordo Vatican in 1979 (that is, he was stilled allowed to teach, but not under the label “Catholic”), he is still considered a priest “in good standing” in his diocese of Basel, Switzerland. The fact that Kung should be “extremely delighted” at the election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio as the new head of the Vatican II Church speaks volumes.

READ MORE

Introducing Jorge Bergoglio…

The Great Pretender:

francis5.jpg

“Pope Francis” is not a Catholic
— and therefore not the Pope

Rev. Jorge Bergoglio has been elected the sixth antipope of the Vatican II Sect. Here’s an initial collection of evidence that the man is not a Roman Catholic and therefore could never be the Pope, could never be the head of the Roman Catholic Church.

The Facts on Francis:

READ MORE

Minor Details…

Apostate Anti-Pope:

Video: Then-“Cardinal” Bergoglio Celebrates 2012 Hanukkah with Jews in Temple

First Commandment Obviously No Big Deal for the Rev. Bergoglio, “Pope Francis”

Reality Check:

  • On Sins against the First Commandment – Superstition: “God may be wrongly worshiped either by false worship or by superfluous worship being paid Him. . . . The ceremonies and practices of the Jewish religion signified that the Messiah was to come, and so now, after the coming of Our Lord, they could not be employed without superstition [=false worship]. Inasmuch as falsehood in religion is a grave injury to God, this species of superstition is mortally sinful.”

READ MORE

Official Communique of the Society of St. Pius X on the Election of “Cardinal” Jorge Bergoglio as “Pope” Francis

francis4.jpg

With the news of the election of Pope Francis, the Society of Saint Pius X prays Almighty God to bestow abundantly on the new Sovereign Pontiff the graces necessary for the exercise of this heavy charge.

Strengthened by divine Providence, may the new pope « confirm his brethren in the faith »[1], with the authority which Saint Pius X proclaimed at the beginning of his pontificate: “We do not wish to be, and with the Divine assistance never shall be aught before human society but the Minister of God, of whose authority We are the depositary.

READ MORE

Who is “Pope” Francis?

francis3.jpg

The Rev. Jorge Mario Bergoglio, now the Vatican II Sect’s “Pope Francis”, was the “Archbishop” of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Time will be needed to analyze the facts about Mr. Bergoglio, but in the mean time, here are a few things of interest:

Taken from Catholic-Hierarchy.org

catholic-hierarchy-bergoglio.jpg

First News & Links:

READ MORE
READ MORE
We Had Been Warned:

Fr. Sylvester Berry in The Church of Christ:

sylvester-berry-church-of-christ

“Satan will imitate the Church of Christ to deceive mankind; he will set up a church of Satan in opposition to the Church of Christ”

In 1927, Fr. E. Sylvester Berry, professor of apologetics at Mount St. Mary’s Seminary in Maryland, wrote the following in his apologetic and dogmatic treatise on the Catholic Church:

The prophecies of the Apocalypse [book of Revelation] show that Satan will imitate the Church of Christ to deceive mankind; he will set up a church of Satan in opposition to the Church of Christ.

READ MORE

The Vatican’s “Guardian of Orthodoxy” is a Heretic himself…

“Archbishop” Gerhard Ludwig Müller Denies Dogma of Perpetual Virginity of Our Lady

image: dpa picture alliance / Alamy Stock Photo

Don’t you hate it when that happens? You’re appointed the “guardian of orthodoxy” in the Vatican, and then people discover you’re a heretic yourself. This has happened to “Archbishop” Gerhard Ludwig Muller, appointed to the post by “Pope” Benedict XVI in 2012.

Aside from other denials of dogma, such as Transubstantiation and the Bodily Resurrection, Muller also denies the dogma of the Perpetual Virginity of the Blessed Virgin Mary. The semi-traditionalist Tradition in Action has the details:

By contrast, the Catholic Church teaches the following dogmatically and infallibly:

If anyone does not properly and truly confess in accord with the holy Fathers, that the holy Mother of God and ever Virgin and immaculate Mary in the earliest of the ages conceived of the Holy Spirit without seed, namely, God the Word Himself specifically and truly, who was born of God the Father before all ages, and that she incorruptibly bore [Him], her virginity remaining indestructible even after His birth, let him be condemned.

READ MORE
READ MORE

Fatima Connection?
Same Old Junk from The Remnant

This episode of “The Remnant Underground” by Mr. Michael Matt is nothing more than an agenda-driven twisting of the facts. The Remnant desperately wants to believe in — and push — a Benedict XVI who is a friend and supporter of Fatima and the True Faith and the True Mass, so they use half-truths to paint a picture of Benedict XVI they want you to believe in. The objective facts, however, tell quite a different story. See for yourself:

Lies and Half-Truths vs. Reality

  • Matt claims: Benedict XVI agrees with Traditional Catholics that the Traditional Mass was never abrogated
    Truth: Yes, Benedict did say this, but it was a lie: In truth the Traditional Mass was suppressed, which is why you needed an “indult” to be allowed to offer it (see How Benedict Destroys the Traditional Mass)
  • Matt claims: Benedict XVI changed “For All” to “For Many” in the New Mass because he agrees that to say “For All” is a lie
    Truth: While Benedict did change “For All” (“Pro Omnibus“) back to “For Many” (“Pro Multis“), he did not concede that “For All” is wrong but that it is an “interpretation” rather than a pure translation, which, however, “was and remains very reasonable” – he does not abandon the conciliar theology behind “For All”: See Benedict’s own ridiculous explanation here and compare it to the reason given by the Roman Catechism (1566) for rejecting “For All”: “With reason, therefore, were the words ‘for all’ not used, as in this place the fruits of the Passion are alone spoken of, and to the elect only did His Passion bring the fruit of salvation” (source)
  • Matt claims: Benedict, through his example, shows he wants Communion in the Hand to be done away with
    Truth: This is a lie.
READ MORE

Slam Dunk against Vatican II…

Novus Ordo Watch Presents

First-Ever Complete English Translation on the Internet

Letter from the Holy Office under Pope Pius IX condemning Ecumenism and affirming True Christian Unity

“Ad Quosdam Puseistas Anglicos”
“To Certain Puseyite Anglicans”

November 8, 1865

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD (PDF)

The binding force of this instruction from the Holy Office, eminently relevant in our difficult times, was reaffirmed by the same Holy Office in 1919, under Pope Benedict XV, and in 1927, under Pope Pius XI.

Highlights:

  • “take care lest, while seeking unity, you turn yourselves aside from the way”
  • “sorry that you happened to think those Christian groups that boast of having the inheritance of the priesthood and the catholic name belong to the true Church of Jesus Christ, even though they are divided and separated from Peter”
  • “what sane person will persuade himself that error can underlie the Church’s public and solemn magisterium”
  • “no one is in the Catholic Church who does not cling to that Rock, on which the foundation of Catholic unity has been set”
  • “all groups entirely separated from external and visible communion with and obedience to the Roman Pontiff cannot be the Church of Christ, nor in any way whatsoever can they belong to the Church of Christ”
READ MORE

Put on Your Surprise Face:

Canadian Novus Ordo Priest picked by Vatican for Conclave Reporting utters Heresy, says Pope is mere “Figurehead”, “First Among Equals”

Rosica on Mansbridge One on One

In an interview shown on Canadian television, the Vatican’s man for English-language reporting on the upcoming conclave, “Fr.” Thomas Rosica, has unashamedly uttered heresy against the dogma of the nature of the papal primacy. The video clip is available here; the heresy is uttered at the 7:28 min mark.

Here is a transcript of the relevant part:

Fr. Rosica: “[…]The leadership of the papacy requires somebody who can connect with people somebody who has health somebody who can move around and not be afraid of long flights.

READ MORE

A Heretic Leads the Vatican’s Office of “Orthodoxy”:

A Prefect for the Destruction of the Faith: “Archbishop” Gerhard Ludwig Müller Denies the Dogma of Transubstantiation in 2002 Book on the Mass

mueller4.jpg

The CDF’s Archheretic Gehard L. Mueller

In his 2002 book Die Messe: Quelle Christlichen Lebens (“The Mass: Source of Christian Life”), the head of the Vatican’s so-called Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Archbishop” Gerhard Ludwig Muller, appointed to the post by “Pope” Benedict XVI, denies the Catholic dogma of Transubstantiation, defined by the Council of Trent. The Semi-Traditionalist site Tradition In Action provides the evidence. See here:

Against Muller’s heresy, the Council of Trent defined infallibly:

If any one denieth, that, in the sacrament of the most holy Eucharist, are contained truly, really, and substantially, the body and blood together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and consequently the whole Christ; but saith that He is only therein as in a sign, or in figure, or virtue; let him be anathema.

READ MORE

A Timely Reminder from 1861:

Fr. Frederick W. Faber

Fr. Frederick Faber on the Deception of the Antichrist

We must remember that if all the manifestly good men were on one side and all the manifestly bad men on the other, there would be no danger of anyone, least of all the elect, being deceived by lying wonders. It is the good men, good once, we must hope good still, who are to do the work of Anti-Christ and so sadly to crucify the Lord afresh…. Bear in mind this feature of the last days, that this deceitfulness arises from good men being on the wrong side.

READ MORE
READ MORE