The Latest on the Viganò Letter Drama…
Vatican II Church Meltdown – Day 8
Developments & Reactions
[More links added Sep. 3]
This post continues our coverage of the ongoing ecclesiastical Chernobyl unleashed by the accusations of the former Vatican nuncio to the United States, “Abp.” Carlo Viganò, which were first published on Aug. 25 and have the potential not only to bring an end to the Francis “pontificate” but even to throw the entire Vatican II Sect into unprecedented chaos:
Saturday, Sep. 1, 2018
- “Abp.” Carlo Viganò releases new letter revealing ‘what really happened’ when Francis met privately with Kim Davis during his 2015 visit to the United States
- FULL DOCUMENT TEXT HERE
- Francis’ mouthpiece “Fr.” Antonio Spadaro, S.J., says in tweet that Vigano’s testimony about the Kim Davis meeting “doesn’t make sense at all”
- Gianluigi Nuzzi, the journalist behind the two “Vatileaks” affairs, says that “Abp.” Vigano is credible
- Ed Pentin reports on Viganò’s responses to videos appearing to show inconsistencies with his testimony
- “Cardinal” Joseph Tobin reportedly declined to investigate McCarrick misconduct rumors
Reactions from Select Blogs and Web Sites
- Vaticanist Andrea Tornielli comments on “Abp.” Vigano’s Aug. 31 interview with LifeSiteNews
- Trying to determine whether the Vigano Letter’s accusations correspond to the truth, The New York Times notes that both Francis and Benedict XVI “could clear up the confusion created by the letter. Neither one has.”
- To explain Francis’ behavior, a blogger reminds his readers of Francis’ Peronist modus operandi first exposed in Omar Bello’s book El Verdadero Francisco (“The True Francis”)
- “Fr.” Dwight Longenecker suspects that if Francis continues his “sad silence” in face of these grave allegations, “we may see the development of a lame duck papacy”
- Dr. Joseph Shaw opines that the enablers of abuse are as much of a problem as the abusers themselves
- Chris Ferrara responds to the “neo-Catholic polemic” addressing the Vigano accusations
- Tom Droleskey on ‘Another Front in the Conciliar War’, Part 4
- Prof. Francis Beckwith points out that “if the media make the request to examine the documents and memos cited in Archbishop Viganò’s testimony, the Holy Father cannot refuse without undermining his credibility and by default his papacy”
- Columnist Rod Dreher says that the Novus Ordo hierarchy’s ‘Stonewalling Silence = Complicity With Sex Abuse’
- Inside the Vatican‘s Robert Moynihan comments on recent developments in his Letter #47 and in his Letter #48
Related Stories
- Crux‘s Inés San Martín provides a handy overview: ‘Who’s who in drama of cover-up accusation against Pope Francis?’
- “Fr.” Michael Holleran of the Archdiocese of New York draws perverted analogy to say sodomites are spiritually “more receptive”
Prior Days’ Coverage
Let’s see if Francis will face some jeers at the Angelus window tomorrow…
Image source: shutterstock.com (modified)
License: Paid
;
No Comments
Be the first to start a conversation