Endorsed by Pope Pius X: The Anti-Christian Conspiracy (1910) by Mgr. Henri Delassus
Monsignor Henri Delassus (1836-1921) was an esteemed French Catholic priest, author, and editor. Pope St. Pius X conferred on him the title of ‘Monsignor’, making him a Domestic Prelate in 1904 and a Protonotary Apostolic in 1911. More information here:
In 1910, Msgr. Delassus published a monumental 3-volume work entitled La Conjuration Antichrétienne, which translates as The Anti-Christian Conspiracy.… READ MORE
Can Catholics resist the Pope because St. Paul resisted St. Peter?
Time and again the recognize-and-resist traditionalists — those who recognize Francis as a true Pope but resist his teachings, laws, and canonizations if they judge them not to be “in line with Tradition” — invoke the incident described in the second chapter of St. Paul’s Letter to the Galatians, in which the Apostle resisted Pope St. Peter “to his face”, as supposed historical precedent and divine approval for “resisting the Pope”.
In a prior blog post, we had already explained, using solid Catholic authorities, why this argument does not hold water.… READ MORE
Condemnation of 12 Propositions pertaining to the Philosophy of Action
December 1, 1924
Students of apologetics will be interested in the following reply of the Holy Office to a series of questions proposed regarding the doctrinal correctness of certain propositions held by some modern teachers in philosophy and theology. The twelve propositions here censured as untenable on Catholic scholastic grounds have in substance been condemned as contrary to right faith and morals by the doctrinal authority of the [First] Vatican Council, but are here separately emphasized to meet definite errors. [underlining added – English translation follows below]
Was Pope Saint Pius X Murdered?
– A Fanciful Tale from 1919
“Was Pope Pius X Murdered?” That was the intriguing headline on page 6 of the editorial section of the Nov. 2, 1919 edition of The New York Times. The author of the piece was one Walter Litchfield.
The article weaves a fanciful tale based chiefly on two things: (a) claims made in the book Le Baptême de Sang (“The Baptism of Blood”) by a French author identified only as Abbé Daniel (“Fr. Daniel”); and (b) an unnamed Italian priest commenting on those claims and adding some of his own.… READ MORE
This tweet of mine was phrased improperly, and I apologize for unwittingly misleading anyone. What I meant is that Sedevacantism is the realization that the only way we can honestly hold (as we must) that God is faithful to His promises for the Papacy is if the Novus Ordo popes
@PhilSteine44850 Oh, I see now what you mean. Thank you, because now I know I need to phrase things more properly so there is no misunderstanding. No, of course Sedevacantism isn't a human effort to keep God's promises, as if God were powerless to keep His own promises. So silly. Rather, what I
So, is Eric Sammons admitting that there has been essential change in doctrine in the last 60 years? If so, why is he part of a religion that teaches something essentially different from Catholicism? If not, why does he claim that the Church lost her mission? https://x.com/NovusOrdoWatch/status/1942589898600386727/photo/1
@PhilSteine44850 No, God's promises were not given to sedevacantists and they're certainly not preserved through human efforts. God's promises were given to the Church, specifically to St. Peter and his lawful successors.
;