Endorsed by Pope Pius X: The Anti-Christian Conspiracy (1910) by Mgr. Henri Delassus
Monsignor Henri Delassus (1836-1921) was an esteemed French Catholic priest, author, and editor. Pope St. Pius X conferred on him the title of ‘Monsignor’, making him a Domestic Prelate in 1904 and a Protonotary Apostolic in 1911. More information here:
In 1910, Msgr. Delassus published a monumental 3-volume work entitled La Conjuration Antichrétienne, which translates as The Anti-Christian Conspiracy.… READ MORE
Can Catholics resist the Pope because St. Paul resisted St. Peter?
Time and again the recognize-and-resist traditionalists — those who recognize Francis as a true Pope but resist his teachings, laws, and canonizations if they judge them not to be “in line with Tradition” — invoke the incident described in the second chapter of St. Paul’s Letter to the Galatians, in which the Apostle resisted Pope St. Peter “to his face”, as supposed historical precedent and divine approval for “resisting the Pope”.
In a prior blog post, we had already explained, using solid Catholic authorities, why this argument does not hold water.… READ MORE
Condemnation of 12 Propositions pertaining to the Philosophy of Action
December 1, 1924
Students of apologetics will be interested in the following reply of the Holy Office to a series of questions proposed regarding the doctrinal correctness of certain propositions held by some modern teachers in philosophy and theology. The twelve propositions here censured as untenable on Catholic scholastic grounds have in substance been condemned as contrary to right faith and morals by the doctrinal authority of the [First] Vatican Council, but are here separately emphasized to meet definite errors. [underlining added – English translation follows below]
Was Pope Saint Pius X Murdered?
– A Fanciful Tale from 1919
“Was Pope Pius X Murdered?” That was the intriguing headline on page 6 of the editorial section of the Nov. 2, 1919 edition of The New York Times. The author of the piece was one Walter Litchfield.
The article weaves a fanciful tale based chiefly on two things: (a) claims made in the book Le Baptême de Sang (“The Baptism of Blood”) by a French author identified only as Abbé Daniel (“Fr. Daniel”); and (b) an unnamed Italian priest commenting on those claims and adding some of his own.… READ MORE
@gonefishin1948 Oh really? Then offer to teach Quas Primas and Mortalium Animos in your diocesan seminary sometime and see what your local ordinary says about that.
@tjhooked1 Any Protestant could make that objection when you challenge him to research the Church Fathers and become Catholic. The question of the vacancy is not a luxurious add-on that is ultimately of little relevance. Only someone who does not understand (or believe in) the Papacy could
@charleybrown77 That's possible, of course, but until there is evidence in that regard, we should assume that others are not being deliberately deceptive. I couldn't in good conscience accuse the three fired professors of deliberately trying to deceive anyone. I have no good reason to believe
@charleybrown77 I should have been more specific. Yes, of course Martin and the other two are themselves part of the progressivist agenda, properly speaking, but on a lower level than the Bergoglians. The fired professors were a speed bump on the way to ultra-progressivist hell - I guess that's
@Catholicizm1 But we should also remember that the prophecy of the scepter not departing from Judah (in Genesis 49:10) was not made void during the period of the Second Temple before the arrival of the Messiah simply because there was no Davidic king during that long time. Then there is also
Innsbruck ‘bishop’ Glettler, known for his love of blasphemous art, says showing Donald Trump on a cross is ‘perverse’ – but calls crucified frog 'awesome'!
;