Exclusive English translation of St. Alphonsus Liguori
What is the Sin of Usury?
The Church’s Doctor of Moral Theology explains
The sin of usury may very well be the most complex topic in all of Catholic moral theology. It involves a great many distinctions and nuances, and what adds to the difficulty is that usury is determined in part by the nature, function, and value of money, which has not always been the same throughout human history.
A pre-Vatican II Catholic dictionary defines “usury” succinctly as follows:
Usury is strictly speaking profit exacted on a loan of money just because it is a loan.
Saint Alphonsus Maria Liguori Doctor of the Church
What is Usury?
MORAL THEOLOGY, vol. II
BOOK III—TREATISE V ON THE SEVENTH COMMANDMENT OF THE DECALOGUE
CHAPTER III—ON CONTRACTS—DUBIUM VII
Exclusive English Translation
PRELIMINARY NOTES
St. Alphonsus Liguori’s treatise on usury is extremely complex. We commissioned an expert in ecclesiastical Latin to translate it for the benefit of the English-speaking public. In order to make the text more comprehensible, the translator has added explanatory comments, so-called “interpolations”, either directly into the text in brackets […] or by means of explanatory footnotes. These translator’s notes can be found at the very end of the text at the bottom of this page.… READ MORE
In 1884, Pope Leo XIII addressed the threat of Freemasonry against Holy Mother Church:
At every period of time each [the Kingdom of God and the kingdom of Satan] has been in conflict with the other, with a variety and multiplicity of weapons and of warfare, although not always with equal ardor and assault. At this period, however, the partisans of evil seem to be combining together, and to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized and widespread association called the Freemasons.
Did the Council of Florence Teach Error? A Response to Athanasius Schneider’s Attempt to Save Vatican II
No matter how one looks at it, the only way one can ever justify or excuse the abominable Second Vatican Council (1962-65) is by trashing the Catholic Church prior to the council. Mr. Athanasius Schneider, auxiliary “bishop” (why the quotes?) of the diocese of Maria Santissima in Astana, Kazakhstan, has just shown that that goes not only for open Modernists but also for some “traditionalists.”
In a newly-released text, the Kazakh prelate once again repeats his claim that there is historical precedent for the idea that a Pope can correct the errors of a prior ecumenical council.… READ MORE
@gonefishin1948 Oh really? Then offer to teach Quas Primas and Mortalium Animos in your diocesan seminary sometime and see what your local ordinary says about that.
@tjhooked1 Any Protestant could make that objection when you challenge him to research the Church Fathers and become Catholic. The question of the vacancy is not a luxurious add-on that is ultimately of little relevance. Only someone who does not understand (or believe in) the Papacy could
@charleybrown77 That's possible, of course, but until there is evidence in that regard, we should assume that others are not being deliberately deceptive. I couldn't in good conscience accuse the three fired professors of deliberately trying to deceive anyone. I have no good reason to believe
@charleybrown77 I should have been more specific. Yes, of course Martin and the other two are themselves part of the progressivist agenda, properly speaking, but on a lower level than the Bergoglians. The fired professors were a speed bump on the way to ultra-progressivist hell - I guess that's
@Catholicizm1 But we should also remember that the prophecy of the scepter not departing from Judah (in Genesis 49:10) was not made void during the period of the Second Temple before the arrival of the Messiah simply because there was no Davidic king during that long time. Then there is also
Innsbruck ‘bishop’ Glettler, known for his love of blasphemous art, says showing Donald Trump on a cross is ‘perverse’ – but calls crucified frog 'awesome'!
;