Interview on French TV
SSPX Superior Bishop Fellay and the Vatican’s “Stamp of Approval” (now with full English Translation)
On Jan. 29, 2017, the internet-based French television station TV Libertés broadcast an interview with the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X, Bishop Bernard Fellay. The interview, which is roughly 17 minutes in length, was part of the program Terres de Mission and can be watched here:
This video has English subtitles, and a complete English transcript is posted further below.
Bp. Fellay has essentially communicated that de facto relations between the Vatican and the SSPX are already normal, and it is not necessary to wait until everything is “totally satisfactory”. He made clear that an agreement between the two sides is intrinsically possible, and if Rome guarantees that the SSPX can continue as it is now, then the only thing that’s needed, according to the French bishop, is Rome’s “stamp of approval”. The U.S. District of the SSPX has posted a brief article on the interview:
- Bishop Fellay Gave Rome a Clear Condition (SSPX.org)
Meanwhile, the Vatican’s Ecclesia Dei commission, which focuses exclusively on dealing with SSPX matters, has weighed in and signaled that reconciliation between the Vatican and the Lefebvrists is not far off:
- Fraternity of St. Pius X, ever closer to reconciliation (Vatican Insider)
What follows below is a complete English translation of the Q&A with Bp. Fellay on TV Libertés, kindly submitted by a reader of Novus Ordo Watch (for the full transcript in the original French, click here):
Interview of Bp. Bernard Fellay, SSPX, by Jean-Pierre Maugendre of TV Libertés on January 29, 2017
Jean-Pierre Maugendre [JPM]: Thank you, your Excellency, for being with us today. Since 1994, you have been the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X [SSPX], founded by Archbishop [Marcel] Lefebvre in 1970 at Fribourg in Switzerland, where you come from. There are now 613 priests, 117 brothers, 80 oblate sisters and 215 seminarians in the Society. We know that every religious institution in the Church has a specific vocation tied to its founder’s charisms, like the Sons of Saint Francis’ poverty and the Dominicans’ missionary zeal. What is the Society’s own spirituality according to you?
Bishop Bernard Fellay [BF]: Well, the Society’s spirituality is not to have any. Or more precisely, it has one, but not its own, but rather it has appropriated the spirituality of the Church, which is much more universal. So, what is it? Well, it’s the salvation that comes to us through the Cross of Our Blessed Lord Jesus Christ. So it comes down to the priesthood, because Our Lord saves us through His priesthood and by the priestly act that is the Cross, and therefore the Mass. So, that’s what the Society’s spirituality is, so we care for priests, instruct and sanctify them and then we hope that they’ll do their job.
JPM: So, a spirituality centred on the priesthood and the Holy Mass.
JPM: The apostolic letter Misecordia et Misera issued last November 21 by Pope Francis reconfirmed that SSPX priests could validly and licitly give sacramental absolution. However, the post-synodal declaration Amoris Laetitia, which allows remarried divorcees the possibility to be admitted to Communion under certain conditions is certainly not something you’re satisfied with. How do you interpret these two a priori contradictory acts?
BF: I might be mistaken, but I think that they come from the same movement, which is the Holy Father’s solicitude for those who have been rejected.
JPM: The peripheries.
BF: Yes, the peripheries. Of course, we’re not exactly physically at the peripheries, we’re not rejected or in prison, but we’re still rejected by the current Church mentality. We’re marginalized in that sense. And I think, again I might be mistaken, that it comes from this desire to care for people who, I believe, the pope blames the Church for having forgotten or set aside.
JPM: Speaking of Amoris Laetitia, there’s a number of Cardinals, Burke, Brandmüller, Caffara and Meisner who have addressed what we call in technical terms dubia, which means that they have asked some questions seeking to clarify that text. This situation, where bishops publicly call out the Pope on one of his magisterial acts, hasn’t happened in the Church for a very long time. The liturgical reform in 1969 was also a departure from previous tradition. Two cardinals, Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci, intervened at the time and, after voicing their confusion to the Sovereign Pontiff, went back into the fold. It seems that, for the last 50 years, there hasn’t been any organized resistance by cardinals and bishops, for example against doctrinal deviations like those in newer catechisms. Do you think that times have changed?
BF: Yes, there’s certainly something changing. I think it’s because the situation has aggravated. Not so much at the level of principles, but these principles are now bearing their fruits or consequences. I don’t think we’ve witnessed the ultimate consequences yet, but it’s getting worse, much worse, to the point where some bishops and cardinals feel compelled to say “enough”. Not many say this publicly, but there are many more who do so privately. It’s still too early to tell if this movement will grow. I think we should hope, and I dare hope, without really being convinced, that things will develop in this way, because things are really bad. That we’re finally saying it is an opportunity to really reflect on what caused this and how we can truly remedy this.
JPM: During your talk at the Journées de la Tradition last October 8 at Port-Marly, you mentioned a growing amount of contacts between the SSPX and some priests and bishops. Despite this, we can’t really say, at least as far as France is concerned, that the bishops are very open to requests to celebrate the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite and applying the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum. Since your travels have led you throughout the Catholic world, could you say if the French situation is specific?
BF: Honestly, I don’t think so. There’s certainly something, and of course, the French remain French…
JPM: What do you mean?
BF: They like to discuss very much, ask questions and debate. But, as far as the crisis in the Church is concerned, what’s happening is, I think, really generalized. And the overall reaction in the Church is honestly still minor, but it’s generalized and also there in France. There certainly haven’t been many bishops who have contacted us or told us “we’re with you”, but it’s happening, it’s slowly happening.
JPM: Regarding your relations with Rome, Pope Francis has offered a personal prelature to the SSPX. This canonical situation would make you totally independent from the bishops. Bishop [Athanasius] Schneider, who was here a few months ago and who visited your seminaries, urged you to accept this proposal even though, or perhaps because, he is aware that the situation in the Church is still not 100% satisfactory. Isn’t there a risk of creating a more or less autonomous church if this current situation of constant distance from Rome, from the Pope, the curia and the bishops continues? Are you waiting for a Pius XIII to appear on the Chair of Peter, which we all aspire to but which is just a possibility, before signing the proposal from Rome?
BF: I think it’s not necessary to wait until everything is solved in the Church and all the problems are resolved. Regardless, some conditions are necessary, and the essential condition for us is our survival. I have clearly told Rome that, like Abp. Lefebvre had already said in his time, there is a sine qua non condition, meaning that we will not move if this condition is not met. That condition is that we can stay as we are. This means keeping all the principles that have kept us alive and have maintained us as Catholics… Indeed, we have several serious criticisms to what has happened in the Church since the council, some, like the way ecumenism is conducted for example, what we call religious liberty, which is a fairly complex term that encompasses the question of relations between Church and State and also the liberty that we grant, or not, and to what extent we give everybody the liberty to practice his religion. The Church used to explain that in some circumstances we have to tolerate [the public expression of false religions], but we see that today, with the pluralistic situation we have, that we must tolerate a lot, but we tolerate… and when we tolerate, we tolerate evil. We cannot say it is a good thing. There’s a certain religion, I think we needn’t even mention which one, which when it proliferates, it does so through terror. That’s something which doesn’t sit right and we have to carefully discern all this. And, regarding these questions, I think we’re going in the right direction and Rome is now less heavy-handed. This is something relatively recent, but since the last two years now they’ve been telling us that some questions that have been stated, not only questions but also declarations, by the council are not criteria for Catholicity. In other words, we can disagree with these declarations and still be considered Catholic. And these are all questions that we are still debating. That’s the first thing.
The second thing is, is there a risk a schism, the establishment of a parallel church? We are fighting against this, and I’ve mentioned this to the pope himself, Pope Francis, and we both agree on this. There are already some concrete dispositions in place now which we can say make schism practically impossible. In our day-to-day life, we talk with Rome and show them our submission, we recognize their authority, not only at Mass by mentioning the Pope’s name and the local bishop in the Canon, but also, well, there’s the example of the Pope granting us the faculty to hear confessions and also legal acts, this is a bit complicated but if a priest were to commit criminal acts, we have contacts in Rome granting us, asking us to judge these cases, so we really have perfectly normal relations. It’s not just confession, there’s also a lot more… Last summer it was confirmed that the Superior General is truly free to ordain the Society’s candidates to the priesthood without asking the local ordinary. This text from Rome, which isn’t shouted from the rooftops, states that the Society’s ordinations are licit, that it is free to [ordain]. These various legal and canonical acts have already been done and I think that they prevent any possibility of schism. Of course, we must always be vigilant about this…
JPM: So, what’s still missing today?
BF: Well, the stamp of approval is missing, as well as an unambiguous promise to respect these guarantees.
JPM: And this stamp and guarantee can only be given by the Pope.
BF: Yes, that’s something the Pope must do.
JPM: To conclude this interview on a hopeful note, we will celebrate the 100th anniversary of the apparitions at Fatima this year. Can you tell us how these events are relevant to the Church and the SSPX today?
BF: It’s not just about the Society, for the Society it’s more the consequences. We know that there is a secret of Fatima, a message and that this message of Fatima portends many difficult and terrible things. There’s a part of it that is known and another that isn’t really known, but anyway, in the end, the Blessed Virgin tells us that “my Immaculate Heart will triumph”, so Heaven’s victory is announced, the victory of the Immaculate Heart of Mary which will be joined with a consecration of Russia that will see it convert, so it will be Catholic again, will be reunified and reintegrated into the Catholic Church, and there will be a time of peace granted to the Church. We can conclude that the crisis we are now in will have ended. Now, we don’t know the details but of course, if we’re saying, and we’re not alone, there’s a crisis in the Church, we can certainly hope that when this triumphant moment comes, this will be past us. I don’t know how much longer this trouble will last, but we have the assurance that, in the end, there will be a triumph, so we’re helping it along by our prayers, we’re well aware that it depends on God, but still, our prayers…
JPM [interrupts]: You have launched a Rosary crusade to this end.
BF: Exactly, we’re asking our faithful and all those who are willing to recite the prayer that the Blessed Virgin has recommended to us, and ask her that what she demanded be accomplished, that this triumph may come, that the consecration be made according to her demands because there have already been a few, that have already had some effect. The main thing that we’re noticing, I can’t say too much on this, is that historical events, not only in the Church but in the world, are linked, for example, the main events of World War II are also tied with the Blessed Virgin, who said that peace among nations had been entrusted to her by God. There are interventions, let’s call it the government of God over men who are real. So, asking God in His mercy to exercise that governance in such a way that men stop wrecking everything and submit to His yoke, can only be a good thing.
Bp. Fellay’s remarks come on the heels of Novus Ordo “Bp.” Athanasius Schneider’s urging of the SSPX Superior to delay an agreement with Rome no longer, right in the midst of what seems to be developing into a brand-new schism within the Vatican II Sect over the “communion-for-adulterers” issue. We recently published insightful commentary on all this here. This is nothing but the blind leading the blind. As our Blessed Lord warned, they will both fall into the pit (see Mt 15:14).
So, Bp. Fellay is only waiting for the “papal” guarantee and the Vatican’s stamp of approval, and he’ll be good to go. Considering what has been going on in Rome under “Pope” Francis since 2013, that stamp might very well come, but it will have the face of Martin Luther on it.
Image source: youtube.com (screenshot)
License: fair use
This is how compromise begins. It never ends well.
Don’t listen to Rome!Francis will destroy you,take your assets,buildings and turn your seminaries into Novus oOrdo wastelands.
Danger. This pope has just stated recently about the mental illness of priests who are tradional/rigid. So sspx walks into the room now? The psychiatrists will get the priests and drug them. They could even get committed by a local govt, that how tough this pope plays. He is a psyche professor. Some sspx priests are already brainwashed.
I wonder, that now the SSPX has been apparently neutralized by the NO, if Sedevacantists and/or trads in the indult orbit, will be up next?
It is remarkable how stubborn he is lately. I mean, he didn’t agree to a deal with Fr. Ratzinger, but he will deal with Bergoglio no matter what he does.
Ego & the vice of human respect will do this to a man.
Seriously: is it possible for foreigners to buy the Martin Luther stamps?
I am minded to buy a dozen and fix them alongside the regular stamps when I send my Christmas cards out to my Novus Ordo friends next year.
In years to come I think the Martin Luther stamps will become sought-after and valuable, if only for the wrong reasons.
At some point the modernists will demand the SSPX say a NO mass.
Let us pray that some SSPX goers will realize what is going on. Bishop Fellay accepts the apostate Novus Ordo false church as the Holy Catholic Church. He emphasized that they pray with and for “Pope Francis” and the local “Bishop” at each Mass. Thus they accept union with heretics and blasphemers of the Gospel.
It is not a question of whether the SSPX will compromise with this church of Satan. They have been compromising with doctrine for decades always with the hope of full reunion with Rome. It looks as if they will get what they are hoping for.
” right in the midst of what seems to be developing into a brand-new schism within the Vatican II Sect over the “communion-for-adulterers” issue.”
From Gloria.tv: Stockholm Syndrome? TV Libertés has asked Bishop Fellay, the Superior of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, how he interprets Pope Francis’ contradicting moves like promoting communion for adulterers and giving faculties to the Fraternity. Fellay’s astonishing answer, “This is a sign of the Holy Father for the rejected and for the peripheries.”
Francis will try to take advantage of all this.
Archbishop Levebre would not even consider regularization under Pope Francis. He would be horrified by the very idea! And the condition mentioned by Fellay, “that we can stay as we are”, is as soft as butter. If he falls into this trap, the SSPX will be gone. Of course Francis will assure Fellay that they can stay as there are. Of course! And the next day — or on any oppurtune future occasion — he will destroy them, under the pretext that they didn’t stay are they were but have changed. Once the SSPX can be reached by Papal power, that power will be used. How can the Superior General be so stupid as to put his own head on the block? Stay away from Francis the Deceiver! Stay independent! There is a bright future for the SSPX if they really stay what they are and continue to refuse any formal ties with the Vatican. That future is that one day they’ll be able to take over the Church. The Modernist Church is dying and is growing more chaotic every day. Disintegration is everywhere. Within a generation it will be over. The SSPX should just wait until the modernist structure collapses. Then they can step in and bring back order.
After much consideration on this issue, I have concluded that the SSPX has no option but to reconcile if they are given the opportunity and told they can remain as is. That is the bargin they made when they decided to continue to recognize the V2 popes as true Popes.
First give them a personal Prelature, then wait till the older SSPX Bishops die. Then promote Fellay to Cardinal and transfer him to some important post. Then appoint Novus Ordo Bishop to emasculate and destroy the SSPX. Frances wins.
They will end up modernists at the end…spiritual assimilation…
I don’t understand why he’s trying so hard to be “in communion with Rome” when Francis has continually denigrated and mocked Catholicism.
That is the question everybody is asking…
Reconcilliation is only possible with those who are in communion with the Catholic Faith.
It struck me when the journalist asked him if we was waiting for a future Pius XIII before he would sign the agreement with Rome!