Here it comes…
Shimon Peres to Francis:
We need a “United Nations of All Religions”!
SEPT 4, 2014: The Italian news agency ANSA is reporting that former President of Israel Shimon Peres, who visited “Pope” Francis this morning in the Vatican, proposed to Francis that he head a “United Nations of All Religions.”
(ANSA) – Rome, September 4 – Former Israeli President Shimon Peres said he has proposed the formation of a United Religions organization to combat terrorism during a meeting at the Vatican on Thursday.
“The UN has had its time,” Peres was quoted as saying by Catholic weekly Famiglia Cristiana. “What we need is an organization of United Religions, the UN of religions.
“It would be the best way to combat these terrorists who kill in the name of their faith, because most people are not like them, they practise their religions without killing anyone, without even thinking about it.
“I think that there should be a charter of the United Religions, just like there is the UN Charter. “The new charter would serve to establish in the name of all the faiths that slitting people’s throats or conducting mass slaughters, like the ones we have seen in recent weeks, has nothing to do with religion.
“This is what I proposed to the pope”.
(“Peres proposes anti-terror ‘Religions UN’ to Pope Francis”, ANSA, Sep. 4, 2014)
Here are other reports on this story:
- “Shimon Peres a Papa Francesco: Fondiamo L’ONU Delle Religioni” (Famiglia Cristiana)
- “Peres al Papa: «Serve un’Onu delle religioni». E candida Francesco alla guida” (24 Ore)
- “Shimon Peres schlägt eine ‘UNO der Religionen’ vor” (Die Presse)
- “Francisco y Simon Peres, a favor de ‘una ONU de las religiones’” (Gaceta Mercantil)
- Commentary by Chiesa e Post Concilio Blog (Italian)
- “Peres proposes ‘UN for religions’ to pope at Vatican” (Jerusalem Post)
- “Peres: Pope Francis is only leader respected enough to end today’s wars” (Catholic News Service)
- “Israel’s Peres pitches ‘UN of Religions’ to pope” (The Telegraph)
- “Peres’ proposal to Francis to set up a UN of religions” (Vatican Insider)
We’ve said before that if Francis isn’t the False Prophet of the Book of the Apocalypse, then the real False Prophet ought to sue him for impersonation. Now he’s got the Ex-President of Israel (!) proposing the ultimate antichrist concept of “United Religions” to bring “peace” — under the direction of an apostate “Pope”!
And now, overwhelmed with the deepest sadness, We ask Ourselves, Venerable Brethren, what has become of the Catholicism of the Sillon? Alas! this organization which formerly afforded such promising expectations, this limpid and impetuous stream, has been harnessed in its course by the modern enemies of the Church, and is now no more than a miserable affluent of the great movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of a One-World Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy, neither discipline for the mind, nor curb for the passions, and which, under the pretext of freedom and human dignity, would bring back to the world (if such a Church could overcome) the reign of legalized cunning and force, and the oppression of the weak, and of all those who toil and suffer.
We wish to draw your attention, Venerable Brethren, to this distortion of the Gospel and to the sacred character of Our Lord Jesus Christ, God and man, prevailing within the Sillon and elsewhere. As soon as the social question is being approached, it is the fashion in some quarters to first put aside the divinity of Jesus Christ, and then to mention only His unlimited clemency, His compassion for all human miseries, and His pressing exhortations to the love of our neighbor and to the brotherhood of men. True, Jesus has loved us with an immense, infinite love, and He came on earth to suffer and die so that, gathered around Him in justice and love, motivated by the same sentiments of mutual charity, all men might live in peace and happiness.
But for the realization of this temporal and eternal happiness, He has laid down with supreme authority the condition that we must belong to His Flock, that we must accept His doctrine, that we must practice virtue, and that we must accept the teaching and guidance of Peter and his successors.
Further, whilst Jesus was kind to sinners and to those who went astray, He did not respect their false ideas, however sincere they might have appeared. He loved them all, but He instructed them in order to convert them and save them. Whilst He called to Himself in order to comfort them, those who toiled and suffered, it was not to preach to them the jealousy of a chimerical equality. Whilst He lifted up the lowly, it was not to instill in them the sentiment of a dignity independent from, and rebellious against, the duty of obedience. Whilst His heart overflowed with gentleness for the souls of good-will, He could also arm Himself with holy indignation against the profaners of the House of God, against the wretched men who scandalized the little ones, against the authorities who crush the people with the weight of heavy burdens without putting out a hand to lift them.
He was as strong as he was gentle. He reproved, threatened, chastised, knowing, and teaching us that fear is the beginning of wisdom, and that it is sometimes proper for a man to cut off an offending limb to save his body.
Finally, He did not announce for future society the reign of an ideal happiness from which suffering would be banished; but, by His lessons and by His example, He traced the path of the happiness which is possible on earth and of the perfect happiness in heaven: the royal way of the Cross. These are teachings that it would be wrong to apply only to one’s personal life in order to win eternal salvation; these are eminently social teachings, and they show in Our Lord Jesus Christ something quite different from an inconsistent and impotent humanitarianism.
(Pope St. Pius X, Apostolic Letter Notre Charge Apostolique[“Our Apostolic Mandate”], 1910; underlining and pargraph breaks added.)
Seems like world events are unfolding perfectly on cue.
“Come, Lord Jesus.” (Apoc 22:20).
Be the first to start a conversation