Reportedly wants a “kinder, gentler” security force

Francis fires Commander of Swiss Guards
The internet is abuzz with news about Francis’ firing of Daniel Anrig, head commander of the Vatican Swiss Guards since 2008, for allegedly being too “rigid.” Here are several interesting news stories covering Francis’ latest move:
- Francis sacks Head of Swiss Guards
- Pope Francis dismisses ‘authoritarian’ Swiss Guard commander
- Pope Francis removes Swiss Guard chief
- Pope sacks the head of his Swiss Guard for being ‘too strict’
The British Telegraph has also provided this video regarding Anrig’s dismissal:
Not everyone believes, of course, that Anrig’s rigidity is the (sole) reason for Francis’ insistence that he step down. The reliable Rorate Caeli blog suspects that there may be a connection to that infamous Vatican ‘Gay Lobby’ that is no longer spoken about since Mr. Bergoglio took over in March of 2013:
Approximately one year ago, news broke from Switzerland that the former head of the Vatican Swiss Guards revealed that Novus Ordo “cardinals” had solicited him for sex — in an explosive interview, Elmar Mader made serious accusations against a homosexual lobby allegedly found in the Vatican:
When Francis was asked directly about a Vatican gay lobby in July of 2013, he agreed that such a thing was bad — not the “gay” part, mind you, but the “lobby” part. As far as resolve to eradicate such a sordid stain on the Vatican’s record, Bergoglio was less than zealous: “We need to see what we can do about it.”
What was “done” about it? Nothing, of course. If anything, sodomite perverts are even more powerful now under Francis than before:
For now, all the reasons for the firing of Swiss Guard commander Daniel Anrig will have to remain on the level of speculation. But one thing’s for certain: At least Anrig now won’t have to worry about having to play gossip police around the Vatican any more.
Related
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Search Our Site
Latest Posts
- Novus Ordo Bishop of Fresno Co-Consecrates Anglican Bishop! April 22, 2026
- Diocesan Cathedral in Canada Hosts Ice Hockey Watch Party – With Pizza and Beer! April 21, 2026
- The Church’s Mystical Passion: What It Is (and Isn’t) April 16, 2026
- Leo XIV in Algiers: Mosques a ‘Divine, Sacred Space’ in which People Pray to Find Presence of God in Their Lives April 14, 2026
- Leo XIV Naturalizes the Gospel, Tells Athletes the Abundant Life Christ Promised is Well-Balanced Earthly Life! April 10, 2026
Latest Comments
See the 25 most recent comments left on our blog: CLICK HERE
Latest Podcast
Subscribe by Email
Be notified each time a new post appears on our blog! CLICK HERE to subscribe. Easy opt-out any time.
Some of our Recent Tweets
There is an essential difference between actually believing in the Papacy (and therefore holding that Leo XIV cannot be Pope) versus merely labeling someone as Pope while building a parallel structure that supposedly saves the Church from the Pope, as it were.

The @SSPXEN have distanced themselves from sedevacantist positions, with the official news outlet publishing a talk against the stance.
@FSSPXFR -- “In light of the doctrinal deviations observed since the Second Vatican Council among a large portion of the ecclesiastical https://t.co/ac1UTuXAfG
This is the kind of drive-by theology that gets attention and engagement perhaps but does nothing in the cause of truth. Not because St. Catherine was mistaken, but because her quote is misunderstood. See response to Anthony from @AmericanReform_ that provides clarity & context.
“Even if the Pope were Satan incarnate, we ought not to raise up our heads against him" St. Catherine of Siena.
@Catholicizm1 Anthony, again, any analogy to the present Crisis fails since there is an essential distinction to be ma…
Well, they act as if the invalidly ordained men were real bishops, so expect them to do the same for the women.
As he prepares for the historic meeting of the first woman Archbishop of Canterbury with Pope Leo XIV, Kurt Koch, the phlegmatic Swiss cardinal who leads the Church’s unity office, explains to Daniel Beurthe, “The Catholic Church cannot recognise Anglican ordinations, as decided
In this 32-second clip of an Anglican ordination, see Fresno 'Catholic bishop' Joseph Brennan, far left, participate by reciting the formula of ordination and extending his hands. Some are insistent this is not a 'co-consecration', but call it what you like, this is what he did. https://x.com/NovusOrdoWatch/status/2047688355215753716/video/1
Francis was a tactician. He was overly kind to the SSPX because he did not have control over them. Flattery and magnanimity towards them were his way to win their favor. Leo XIV is different. He may just try to sit this one out, perhaps because the less noise is made, the better?

SSPX superior Father Pagliarani states that Pope Leo XIV has still not replied to their request to meet prior to consecration date of July 1.
Adds Pope Francis met with him very swiftly.
He states:
I am nonetheless surprised that there has so far been no personal reply or https://t.co/EiIzBN1krz
@poperespecter1 Kind of ironic, coming from the spinmeister extraordinaire.
Characteristic use of “today” in this statement by @Pontifex:
“The Holy See has made it clear that we do not agree with…
There is so much spin in our day. Influencers want to see their narrative confirmed, rather than dispassionately analyzing the facts.

Opposite ends of the spectrum. Both want to pretend the other 1/2 wasn’t said. https://t.co/ee2Vb6N8Io

No Comments
Be the first to start a conversation