Reportedly wants a “kinder, gentler” security force

Francis fires Commander of Swiss Guards
The internet is abuzz with news about Francis’ firing of Daniel Anrig, head commander of the Vatican Swiss Guards since 2008, for allegedly being too “rigid.” Here are several interesting news stories covering Francis’ latest move:
- Francis sacks Head of Swiss Guards
- Pope Francis dismisses ‘authoritarian’ Swiss Guard commander
- Pope Francis removes Swiss Guard chief
- Pope sacks the head of his Swiss Guard for being ‘too strict’
The British Telegraph has also provided this video regarding Anrig’s dismissal:
Not everyone believes, of course, that Anrig’s rigidity is the (sole) reason for Francis’ insistence that he step down. The reliable Rorate Caeli blog suspects that there may be a connection to that infamous Vatican ‘Gay Lobby’ that is no longer spoken about since Mr. Bergoglio took over in March of 2013:
Approximately one year ago, news broke from Switzerland that the former head of the Vatican Swiss Guards revealed that Novus Ordo “cardinals” had solicited him for sex — in an explosive interview, Elmar Mader made serious accusations against a homosexual lobby allegedly found in the Vatican:
When Francis was asked directly about a Vatican gay lobby in July of 2013, he agreed that such a thing was bad — not the “gay” part, mind you, but the “lobby” part. As far as resolve to eradicate such a sordid stain on the Vatican’s record, Bergoglio was less than zealous: “We need to see what we can do about it.”
What was “done” about it? Nothing, of course. If anything, sodomite perverts are even more powerful now under Francis than before:
For now, all the reasons for the firing of Swiss Guard commander Daniel Anrig will have to remain on the level of speculation. But one thing’s for certain: At least Anrig now won’t have to worry about having to play gossip police around the Vatican any more.
Related
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Search Our Site
Latest Posts
- New Vatican Eco-Document Calls Holy Eucharist ‘School of Ecology’ September 3, 2026
- Paul VI in 1965: Vatican II Contains ‘Numerous Doctrinal Points Proposed by the Extraordinary Magisterium’ August 31, 2026
- Bergoglio Blacked Out: Russia Censors LGBTQ-Friendly Passages in ‘Pope’ Francis’ Autobiography August 28, 2026
- Leo XIV Prays Before Horrid Crucifix Condemned by Pope Benedict XV August 27, 2026
- Quick Summer Break at Novus Ordo Watch until August 25, 2026 August 18, 2026
Latest Comments
See the 25 most recent comments left on our blog: CLICK HERE
Latest Podcast
Subscribe by Email
Be notified each time a new post appears on our blog! CLICK HERE to subscribe. Easy opt-out any time.
Some of our Recent Tweets
Burke is a man of Vatican II.
Burke: "We don't necessarily think that Moses wrote all five books [of the Pentateuch]."
Source: Cardinal Burke - The Old Testament SRS #337. https://t.co/S2NyfgPQE0 (timestamp embedded)
The Pontifical Biblical Commission in 1906, with the solemn ratification of Pope St. Pius https://t.co/ZNUiWtkVsU
'Cardinal' Walter Brandmüller on the 'Synodality Enigma' - https://www.diakonos.be/the-synodality-enigma-cardinal-brandmuller-explains-how-not-to-fall-into-mephistopheless-traps/
The Great Apostasy: An Open Letter - https://goldenarrow333.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-great-apostasy-open-letter.html A brief explanation of Sedevacantism....
The Limits of Papal Power: Contrasting Traditional Catholic Teaching with the Recognize-and-Resist Distortion - https://novusordowatch.org/2024/04/limits-of-papal-power-traditional-catholic-teaching/ Enough of the semi-traditionalist sophistry! https://x.com/NovusOrdoWatch/status/2097414466648375709/photo/1
@pluant No, the Pope certainly cannot do whatever he pleases. Here is the difference between your position and mine: https://t.co/G2X8Ea7HoN https://t.co/OSJWhIMsQc
@OTSOTA 'Quo Primum' is not unchangeable: https://t.co/94PGJmOtCO
@mellafinger My position isn't that the Pope can do whatever he wants. That's basically your position, you just hold that when the Pope does do something he can't do, then we have to reject and resist it. My position is that if he can't do it, then he won't, precisely because he can't.
@AramisCatholic Of course. But the divine elements - the separate consecration of bread and wine - are very few; and since it is impossible for man to change them, it is likewise impossible to a Pope should ever issue a decree claiming to change them.

No Comments
Be the first to start a conversation