Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Sodom & Gomorrah in Vienna Cathedral

“Cardinal” Schönborn celebrates Homosexual Prayer Service with blasphemous Transvestite

Words fail at the latest abomination perpetrated inside St. Stephen’s Cathedral in Vienna, Austria.

On Dec. 1, 2017, “Cardinal” Christoph Schönborn presided over an interconfessional prayer service entitled Mozart Requiem in his cathedral church for “World AIDS Day”. The event was co-hosted by a certain Gery Keszler, organizer of the annual Life Ball fundraising gala in the Austrian capital to support people infected with HIV (AIDS). In reality, of course, it is a massive LGBT/”gay pride” promo celebrating Sodom and Gomorrah.

The semi-trad news site Gloria TV posted the following report on the infernal spectacle in St. Stephen’s this past Friday:

On December 1, Cardinal Christoph Schonborn (72) celebrated “World AIDS Day” with a special service in Vienna Cathedral. The event was co-hosted by the notorious homosexual Gerry [sic] Keszler. He is the organizer of Vienna’s “Life Ball”, one of the biggest homo events in Europe. Keszler and Schonborn regularly get together for private dinners.

Schonborn received Keszler at the cathedral entrance. In his opening remarks, he again welcomed Keszler “and all who are responsible for making Life Ball happen.” In a prayer for people who have died of AIDS, Schonborn claimed that “all” will one day be allowed to “find their home” in God. The dead, he said, are “not lost forever.”

In the bidding prayers, the transvestite Thomas Neuwirth, who calls himself “Conchita Wurst”, lamented an alleged “persecution of those who live their identity in a way that is different from that of the majority.” Afterwards, he invited the people to come up, put a grain of incense into a bowl [!], and offer a personal petition.

In his concluding remarks inside the cathedral, Keszler said that it is not important whom we love or what we believe in. Schonborn thanked Keszler for his comments.

(“Wiener Kardinal zelebriert in seiner Kathedrale die Homosex-Ideologie”, Gloria TV, Dec. 2, 2017; our translation.)

The sacrilegious performance can be watched here:

Incidentally, the AIDS pseudo-liturgy offered in the Viennese cathedral on Dec. 1 included a reading from the book of the Apocalypse. This is the pericope that was read:

And I saw a new heaven and a new earth. For the first heaven and the first earth was gone, and the sea is now no more. And I John saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice from the throne, saying: Behold the tabernacle of God with men, and he will dwell with them. And they shall be his people; and God himself with them shall be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes: and death shall be no more, nor mourning, nor crying, nor sorrow shall be any more, for the former things are passed away. And he that sat on the throne, said: Behold, I make all things new.

(Apoc 21:1-5)

Not surprisingly, the reading stopped there and did not continue, although what follows would have been more appropriate for the occasion:

And he said to me: Write, for these words are most faithful and true. And he said to me: It is done. I am Alpha and Omega; the beginning and the end. To him that thirsteth, I will give of the fountain of the water of life, freely. He that shall overcome shall possess these things, and I will be his God; and he shall be my son. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, they shall have their portion in the pool burning with fire and brimstone, which is the second death…. There shall not enter into [the heavenly Jerusalem] any thing defiled, or that worketh abomination or maketh a lie, but they that are written in the book of life of the Lamb.

(Apoc 21:5-8,27)

Another fitting scriptural passage that didn’t make it into the “prayer service” is this one:

Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God.

(1 Cor 6:9-10)

Oh well, this is par for the course.

Ironically, the perverted event began with a beautiful rendition of Mozart’s Dies Irae (“Day of Wrath”), which is used in the traditional Roman Requiem Mass as a sequence. It may be doubted, however, that anyone provided a vernacular translation of the Latin lyrics:

Day of wrath and doom impending,
David’s word with Sibyl’s blending,
Heaven and earth in ashes ending.

O what fear man’s bosom rendeth,
When from heaven the Judge descendeth,
On whose sentence all dependeth.

Wondrous sound the trumpet flingeth,
Through earth’s sepulchers it ringeth,
All before the throne it bringeth.

Death is struck, and nature quaking,
All creation is awaking,
To its Judge an answer making.

Lo, the book exactly worded,
Wherein all hath been recorded,
Thence shall judgment be awarded.

When the Judge His seat attaineth,
And each hidden deed arraigneth,
Nothing unavenged remaineth.

What shall I, frail man, be pleading?
Who for me be interceding
When the just are mercy needing?

King of majesty tremendous,
Who dost free salvation send us,
Fount of pity, then befriend us.

Think, kind Jesus, my salvation
Caused Thy wondrous Incarnation,
Leave me not to reprobation.

Faint and weary Thou hast sought me,
On the Cross of suffering bought me,
Shall such grace be vainly brought me?

Righteous Judge, for sin’s pollution
Grant Thy gift of absolution,
Ere that day of retribution.

Guilty now I pour my moaning,
All my shame with anguish owning,
Spare, O God, Thy suppliant groaning.

Through the sinful woman shriven,
Through the dying thief forgiven,
Thou to me a hope hast given.

Worthless are my prayers and sighing,
Yet, good Lord, in grace complying,
Rescue me from fires undying.

With Thy sheep a place provide me,
From the goats afar divide me,
To Thy right hand do Thou guide me.

When the wicked are confounded,
Doomed to flames of woe unbounded,
Call me with Thy Saints surrounded.

Low I kneel with heart’s submission,
See, like ashes, my contrition,
Help me in my last condition.

Ah! That day of tears and mourning,
From the dust of earth returning,
Man for judgment must prepare him,
Spare, O God, in mercy spare him.

Lord, all-pitying, Jesus blest,
Grant them Thine eternal rest. Amen.

(Source)

“Cardinal” Schonborn, of course, is proficient in Latin and knows the content of the Dies Irae very well. In fact, he even made reference to it in his homily, although, of course, not the way he should have: Instead of preaching the necessity of repentance and warning the attendees against mortal sin, especially sins against the Sixth and Ninth Commandments, he offered the usual Novus Ordo platitudes about forgiveness, solace, and the rest.

In fact, “His Eminence” asserted several times that Christ came to save, not to judge or condemn. Although this is true in the sense that Christ seeks our salvation, not our condemnation (cf. Jn 12:47; 1 Tim 2:4), it is not true in the sense that Christ will not condemn but only save (cf. Mt 25:46; 1 Cor 6:9-10; Jas 2:24). Just guess which sense Schonborn gave to the holy words of our Lord! He spoke them in the context of a prayer service which countless unrepentant sodomites attended in order to mourn the loss of their partners in crime, and he entirely neglected to mention that Christ will judge and condemn those who do not die in the state of sanctifying grace (a state which is entirely incompatible with the practice of unnatural vice). Worse yet, Schonborn said explicitly:

Und die Frage wird sein: War ich einer, der gerichtet hat, statt zu retten? Johannes vom Kreuz hat gesagt, am Abend unseres Lebens zählt nur die Liebe. Was erwarte ich mir von diesem Abend? So beeindruckend. Daß etwas in unser Land hinausgeht, vielleicht wirklich von hier aus. Wenn Gott nicht zu richten gekommen ist, sondern zu retten, was heißt das für uns? Nicht zu urteilen, nicht auszugrenzen, nicht andere ausrichten. Das, liebe Freunde, das kann unser Land verändern, nachhaltig. Vielleicht geht das auch von diesem Abend aus.

And the question [we will be asked at our judgment] will be: Was I someone who condemned [people] rather than saved [them]? John of the Cross said that at the end of our lives, only love counts. What do I expect of this evening? [It’s] so impressive. [I expect] that something will go out into our nation, perhaps truly [starting] from here. If God did not come to condemn but to save, what does this mean for us? Not to judge, not to exclude, not to bring [people] into line. This, dear people, can change our nation, in the long run. Perhaps this is what will come out of this evening.

(Source; 24:57-26:15 min mark; our translation.)

It is utterly despicable! Schonborn quotes Christ but manipulates the meaning of His words! Our Lord’s words are, in themselves, full of spirit and life (see Jn 6:64), but Schonborn has diabolically turned them into words of death and damnation because he has used them to confirm sinners in their sins, pretending that since Christ came to save and not to condemn, they will not be condemned. A more diabolical message can hardly be imagined.

For the perverted ceremony at St. Stephen’s Cathedral, sundry homo memorial banners were hung inside the cathedral (i.e. sodomites mourning their deceased partners), while others were spread out on the floor (not visible).

After Schonborn’s hellish sermon, the nose-ring-wearing pretend-woman Thomas Neuwirth stepped up to the microphone. Having placed a grain of incense onto a burning coal, he uttered the following prayer (notice that he does not address it to anyone or anything — he just starts talking):

Gib uns einen wachen Blick, nicht nur hier, sondern auch an allen anderen Orten. Laß uns die Welt und ihre Menschen wirklich wahrnehmen, damit die Verfolgung derer, die ihre Identität anders leben als die meisten, aufhört. Hilf uns, jede Ausgrenzung und Diskriminierung zu durchbrechen. Laß uns hinsehen und achtsam sein. Laß uns immer wieder Schritte machen auf die zu, die anders sind, als wir selbst.

Wir bitten dich, erhöre uns.

Give us a keen sense of perception, not only here but also in any other place. Make us truly aware of the world and its people so that the persecution of those who live their identity in a way that is different from that of the majority, will cease. Help us to break through every kind of exclusion and discrimination. Make us pay close attention and be watchful. Make us keep taking steps towards those who are different from ourselves.

We beg thee, hear us.

(Source; 27:55-28:26 min mark; our translation.)

Who or what the grain of incense was offered to, as well as the prayer, won’t require much conjecture.

For those who need a reminder as to who Thomas Neuwirth is, and who admires him, here is a shocking refresher:

Neuwirth’s pseudonym, “Conchita Wurst”, is no accident, and it is filled with meaning: “Conchita” is a diminutive of the Spanish first name Concepción, which refers to the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary (similarly, Spanish given names also include Lourdes and Guadalupe). Thus we can see that this transvestite pervert is directly trying to attack the Mother of God, Mary Most Holy, and this is not surprising, because the wickedness of this world is in manifest contradiction to the holy laws of Almighty God and the order He established. But the last name, “Wurst”, is likewise significant. Wurst, though it is the German word for “sausage,” is used by German speakers to indicate indifference: If something is “Wurst” to you, it means you are indifferent concerning it; it doesn’t matter to you (source).

Thus the name “Conchita Wurst” is specifically intended to offend the Blessed Virgin Mary and thereby Almighty God and the Catholic Church, and it tells the world that we should be indifferent as to whether someone is male or female, a man or a woman, whether he/she dresses as or is attracted to the one or the other. The created order is to be repuidated entirely, and now this rejection is to encompass not only the supernatural (“religious”) sphere any longer, as had hitherto been the case, but now even the natural as well: There is to be no more distinction between even so much as male and female, which is a direct repudiation of Genesis 1:27.

As for Mr. Schonborn, the Austrian pretend-cardinal and pretend-Catholic, he is a former student of Joseph Ratzinger (“Pope” Benedict XVI), is considered a “conservative” (!) in the Vatican II Church, and is a theological giant — he was the primary editor of the 1992 so-called Catechism of the Catholic Church, which “Pope” John Paul II promulgated with his (non-existent) “apostolic authority” (source) and to which Ratzinger gave his “imprimatur”.

This is the same Schonborn, by the way, who overturned a pastor’s decision barring an openly-practicing sodomite from sitting on the parish council, and who has encouraged and participated in the wildest liturgical chaos imaginable (yes, including flame throwers, pornography, and stage diving — we are NOT kidding!). This is also the same Schonborn who allows his cathedral rector to give “blessings” to homosexual “couples” every year on St. Valentine’s Day, and who allowed an open atheist, Communist, sexual deviant, and blasphemer to exhibit his “artwork” that displayed the Last Supper as a homosexual orgy, right there in the cathedral’s museum. To top it off, Schonborn later granted, through his cathedral rector, a “Catholic” (i.e. Novus Ordo) burial to the Communist blasphemer, complete with a red casket and a pornographic sculpture for a tombstone (see video here). Schonborn is also on record lauding as “exemplary human behavior” sodomite couples who “faithfully care” for one another.

Let’s face it: “Cardinal” Schonborn is satanic, and this “homo liturgy” he just conducted in the cathedral of Vienna is simply the latest offense in an ever-growing heap of crimes against the Most Holy Trinity, the saints, and the souls our Blessed Lord came to save.

45 Responses to ““Cardinal” Schönborn celebrates Homosexual Prayer Service with blasphemous Transvestite”

  1. Lee

    Schönborn might be a good successor of Bergoglio or as Hilary Clinton would say “at this point what difference does it make.”

  2. BurningEagle

    Keep ’em coming, all you Novus Ordo prelates. You are the best advertisements the sedevacantists have!
    Look at what these monsters have done in 60 short years. And, it will continue to get worse. Again, most Novus Ordites will not even raise and eyebrow.

    • Julius

      I’m R&R and consider Schonborn an heratic and apostate and so don’t wish to try and spin his demonic antics but one thing that is holding me back from Sedevacantism is the fact that Our Lord criticised and severely rebuked the high priest Caiphas and most of the Pharisees and Scribes saying they had no faith and even called them whitened sepulchres. However, He never denied Caiphas, and the others, their hierarchical positions and even the Gospel writers clearly never indicate that their office be questioned. It would have been a sede type option back then to say that Caiphas couldn’t possibly be the High Priest as he was faithless, had an inferior understanding of scripture and denied Christ as the Messiah.

      • Novus Ordo Watch

        You are inferring too much from our Lord’s silence. He was silent, too in the face of all the false accusations made against Him — that doesn’t mean they were true. Our Lord was silent because: “He was offered because it was his own will, and he opened not his mouth: he shall be led as a sheep to the slaughter, and shall be dumb as a lamb before his shearer, and he shall not open his mouth” (Isaias 53:7).

        The only time our Lord spoke was when He was commanded by the high priest to answer whether He was the Messias, and that is something our Lord had an obligation to testify to, and the high priest had a right to know the answer. After He had answered, the high priest rent his garments: “Then the high priests rent his garments, saying: He hath blasphemed; what further need have we of witnesses? Behold, now you have heard the blasphemy” (Matthew 26:65).

        St. Jerome, Doctor of the Church and patron of Bible scholars, commented on this passage as follows: “And by this rending [of] his garments, [Caiaphas] shews that the Jews have lost the priestly glory, and that their High Priest’s throne was vacant. For by rending his garment he rent the veil of the Law which covered him.”

        And there you go. The high priest, too, was deprived of his office by his apostasy. The St. Jerome quote is contained in the “Catena Aurea” Gospel commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas, Universal Doctor of the Church (Vol. I, Part III [Oxford: John Henry Parker, 1842], p. 926). You can read it for yourself here: https://archive.org/details/p3catenaaureacomm01thom

        God bless you.

      • BurningEagle

        Certainly one difference is that, to my knowledge, the High Priest of the Old Testament was not infallible, and the old testament religion was not infallible and indefectible. Please correct me if I am wrong.
        Regardless, the Catholic Church, established by Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the Eternal Holy Trinity, has been given infallibility and indefectibility in St. Peter and his succesors. The Catholic Church has also been defined as One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic. There has been a consistent homogenous magisterium regarding these things. No one can deny them.
        But that NECESSARILY means that the new Church and its proponents could not possibly have the authority of the offices they claim to hold, while at the same time they are heretical and inimical to Her.
        How could PIUS IX infallibly condemn Religious Liberty in Quanta Cura, and then Vatican II “popes” teach and promote the very same condemned doctrine?
        How can the evolution of dogma be condemned by St. Pius X, but now it is the common teaching of the Vatican II “popes.”
        How could PIUS XI infallibly condemn ecumenism in Mortalium Animos, and then the Vatican II popes promote it as the best thing since sliced bread?
        How can divorce and “remarriage” be a sacrilege before Vatican II, but now is the official magisterium of the “church” under Jorge and his Scarlet letter, Amoris Laetitia?
        How can Roncalli reverse the beatification of Blessed Andrea da Rinn of Tyrol?
        How could the Church teach that outside of the Catholic Church there is no salvation, but then the “popes” teach that all religions are good, and proselytism is bad?
        I could go on an on. Do they do these things with Christ’s authority? If they do, then Christ is not God, because God can neither deceive nor be deceived. If they do not do these things with Christ’s authority, then they do not hold the positions which they claim to hold.

        A great usurpation occurred.

        You are correct in considering Schonborn a heretic and an apostate. Apparently you would be in a state of disobedience to your popes who think he is just great.

        Try these:
        https://youtu.be/02FQW4nYLX0
        https://youtu.be/cJNoK1al-Yc

      • BurningEagle

        I would also ask that you ponder what Jorge said concerning Amoris Laetitia. He told folks to go ask Schonborn about it, and he called Schonborn : “a great theologian, one of the best today and one of the most mature.”

      • 2c3n1 .

        Julius, why do you consider Schonborn a heretic and apostate, but not Francis? Of all the people in the church, do you think the pope is the one person who doesn’t have to profess the faith when only he according the First Vatican Council declared is the one who keeps the Catholic religion unsullied and teaching holy, unimpaired by any error, with an unfailing faith, who turns the poisonous food of error away from the flock of Christ, nourishing the Catholic flock with heavenly doctrine, removing all occasion of schism that the Church might be saved as one because he stays firm against the gates of hell?

  3. Sonia

    Hmm. But it’s the sedevacantist ruining Catholicism, eh? No. It’s triumphalist protestantism, islamism, rabbinicalism – all useful idiots of freemasonism.

    PS. To all those Novus Ordite Indult R&R … you will have to account for choosing your soft pillows at the expense of exiled souls.

  4. Sonia

    PS. Please some kind soul cut off “conchita’s” queer beard, or just cut off the mockingjay. Conchita/abomination. Don’t need to flip that around.

  5. Clare Forkin

    It’s all about Show business! And this is the same Schoenborn who came to Ireland last year to a so called preparatory Conference for the World Meeting of Families 2018, (at which Bergolio is due to attend), and made an emotional appeal regarding Amoris Laetitia on the basis of exceptional hardcases! It was appalling and blasphemous, all in keeping with the same horrible homo-philial slant that has been given to the World Meeting of Families by the Novusordo Bishops Conference in Ireland! Is there any chance of preventing such a sacrilege?
    because few of the flock seem to either be aware or to care for that matter! Any suggestions as to how to keep Bergolio out of Ireland?

      • Clare Forkin

        Thanks for the advice. There are many in Ireland already dreading what is being planned for the next year’s World Meeting of Families 2018 ballyhoo! It seems as though it will be used as a show case for the worst of Amoris Laetitia’s poison! Keep praying

        • BurningEagle

          Why dread it? Look forward to it as just another demonstration of the perfidy of Jorge and his church. The more outragious they are, the better!

          • Clare Forkin

            That may well be.. However, there seems to be a direct correlation between the perfidy of Jorge and the “stupidity” of his followers In the Novusordo! -with the extra dimension that is tragic in the aristotelian sense of a “willingness to totally suspend disbelief” or judgement, because the subject is “the Pope”. This is particularly the case in Ireland, where the concept of Sedevacantism is regarded as the highest level of treachery, if it is ever understood.

          • BurningEagle

            I am not Irish, and am not well versed in what is going on in Ireland. However, there have been over the last few years some polls taken in Ireland regarding what the Irish “faithful” believe. I think that Vortex (Novus Ordo) guy also reported on it. They do not believe in a Sunday obligation to assist at Mass (I use the term loosely). They do not believe in transubstantiation. They do not believe the Catholic Church is the One, True Church of Christ, outside of which there is no salvation. Etc, etc. They have been ruined, just as badly as the rest of the world (France, Italy, Germany, and of course the USA).

            I think the Irish have been so heavily involved with political fights for so long against England and Protestantism, that sedevacantism does not fit with their political struggles, and is an embarassment to them. They do not realize, or refuse to realize, that their fight for Novus Ordoism is in fact a fight against the Catholic Church and against their Irish heritage.

          • Clare Forkin

            Your analysis is spot on and really insightful, especially the latter paragraph! Thank you!

    • 2c3n1 .

      Did you know that John Paul II asked a saint to protect a false religion? He said, “May Saint John Baptist protect Islam and all the people of Jordan, and all who participated in this celebration, a memorable celebration.” John Paul II also covered crucifixes in the Vatican when the Jews came to town so as not to offend them. He publicly rejected several dogmas of the Catholic faith. Does that sound like a saint to you?

      • BurningEagle

        Don’t forget that he said Martin Luther was a “profoundly religious man” and a “great reformer.” Don’t forget the Assisi world day of prayer for peace (or whatever they called it) where he had the Buddha Idol worshipped in a Catholic Church. How about all naked ladies reading the epistles? How about all the nearly naked women doing very suggestive gymnastic routines for him all the time as entertainment?
        How about his communicatio in sacris with the Lutherans on Dec 11, 1983, when he delivered a heretical sermon (DURING the LUTHERAN service) in which he said the miracles of Christ are not compelling (do not prove His divinity) but only hint at it? During that same sermon he erroneously said that St. John the Baptist did not know if Jesus Christ was the Messias!

      • raphaelheals

        There is a chasm between us. As St. James said “You will be judged for every word that you utter.” St. John Paul steered the church through the most treacherous of seas in the most difficult of times. I love him .

        • 2c3n1 .

          You didn’t answer my question based on what I asked. I once loved him, too, when I was ignorant. Now I see that he fooled many of us. I came to realize that what I thought was the Catholic Church is not the Catholic Church. It’s a counterfeit religion filled with abomination. What’s the most difficult thing for you to do now is to accept the truth and realize that you’ve been hoodwinked. John Paul II is not a saint. He wasn’t even Catholic.

          • Siobhan

            Here you demonstrate how a Catholic must act when having an understanding of the Church’s definition of love. Love is an act of the Will, not an emotion. It is a product of the intellect, to put it very simply. When you realized that the VII Sect was posing as the Catholic Church, you withdrew love for Wojtyla-the head of the Sect. If I may say, you also express love of neighbor, in encouraging a commenter here to face a devastating truth, while expressing to him your compassion for how difficult all this will be for him. This took courage & I admire it.

    • BurningEagle

      That is because “Saint” John Paul II said and did unconscionable things. The man was a blasphemous, impure, heresiarch. Do some research. There was no internet back then, but there were newspaper articles, there were audio recordings.

  6. BurningEagle

    The fact that Jorge could do a fake canonization for a fake “saint” should tell you that he and all the rest of the clowns (from Roncalli through Jorge) are usurpers, and not popes. They are enemies. They are not Catholics. And, Amoris Laetitia is NOT the magisterium of the Church, but the teaching of inimikcal heretics who have hijacked the church.

  7. BurningEagle

    I agree the magisterium of the Catholic Church is infallible. Therefore, she cannot contradict herself.
    If She infallibly condemned religious liberty (Quanta Cura of Pius IX) then it is always condemned. If She infallibly condemned ecumenism (Mortalium Animos of Pius XI), then it is always condemned. If She infallibly condemned Modernism (Pascendi and Lamentabile Sane of St. Pius X) then it is always condemned.
    She cannot embrace those things as good which were once condemned as evil. She cannot teach as true, what she formerly condemed as erroneous.

    https://youtu.be/02FQW4nYLX0

  8. 2c3n1 .

    Sorry bud but you’re still a Protestant only now you go around calling yourself Catholic. Antipope John Paul II was canonized by the Counterfeit Catholic Church. You won’t find real saints acting like apostates, which proves (using the bad fruit metaphor) that your religion that canonized John Paul II is not the Catholic Church.

  9. Susan Matthiesen

    Since Cardinal Schonborn does all the above, why then should we believe anything he says about Medjugorje? He says that fake apparition is real!

    • BurningEagle

      We should not believe anything that any of the Novus Ordites say about anything.
      Regarding private revelations, you will not be judged on your knowledge of private revelations (even the approved ones) but you will be judged on how well you studied the Catholic faith (doctrines and dogmas, worship, morals and disciplines).
      Therefore, is is not important to know about Our Lady of Walsingham (approved private revelation) But it was often inserted in examinations of conscience (before the wretched council) that you had a duty to learn your faith to the best of your ability and state in life.

      I would stay as far away from Garabundal, Medjugorje, Bayside, etc. as possible. I can give you horror stories: one being a staunch traditionalist becoming a Novus Ordite. I would also advise getting rid of the blue Pieta booklet.

  10. jay

    Book of Wisdom 17:2″ For while the wicked thought to be able to have dominion over the Holy nation they themselves being fettered with the bonds of darkness, and a long night, shut up in their houses , lay there exiled from eternal providence . ” The Vatican II sect seems to mirror the Egyptians very well.

  11. 2c3n1 .

    Listen raphaelheals, Christ did found the Catholic Church but He didn’t found the counterfeit Catholic Church with all of its heresies. The Vatican 2 popes have mislead millions with their abominations they pose as doctrinal truth. Yes, we are angry because they have robbed us of our churches and got our people lost in a cult they call the Catholic Church. Your own Francis keeps appointing homosexual and homosexual friendly bishops. He told us that our Catholic God doesn’t exist. Just read all the blasphemies he spews from this website. These are facts, not our opinions. Surely you don’t agree with their heresies and blasphemies?

    We are not in darkness because we know the Faith, but you can’t defend your Vat2 popes and religion because it’s completely indefensible. You’re running on emotion but not logic. What’s sad to see is that they have completely fooled you and you think we are the ones lost. I’m trying to help you come into the light of the Catholic Faith and out of your counterfeit religion that teaches that non-Catholic religions are a means to salvation and that the Church of Christ is made up of false religions where girls run around the altar as servers (which 3 popes have condemned as evil) but John Paul II approved them and said, they enhance the liturgy.

    Have you not seen how Benedict XVI bowed towards a Lutheran altar (twice) and prayed with a woman bishop or bowed towards Mecca in a Mosque with shoes off and arms folded with a Muslim leader? Have you not seen how he invited a Voodoo Warlock to worship his goddess and be possessed by the demon in front of an altar in a Catholic Cathedral? Have you not seen John Paul II actively participate in a Zoroastrian religious ceremony? I could go on and on.

    Darkness has overcome the Vatican just as the Catholic Church said it would many times in Catholic prophecy. What will it take for you to see that we are right and it is out of love that we’re trying to help you?

  12. Lee

    Raphaelheals you sound angry when you write knowing that there is something seriously wrong with what you think is the Catholic Church and yet you say we are full of hatred and that Satan is deceiving us. Our peace is in knowing what the Catholic Church has always taught and what the Novus ordo fails to teach because of its numerous blasphemous heresies, which are not holy and you know it. Holy is a 2nd mark of the Church. If the Novus Ordo isn’t holy it doesn’t possess one of it’s essential marks and therefore is not that Catholic Church. Members may be unholy, yes, but they cannot teach heresy and still remain apart of the body of the Church.

    Of course we love Our Father in heaven. What makes you think we don’t? Our love of service is to bring all men of good will back to the Church. The problem is not all men are of good will, even though Christ died for all. What we say is not darkness but the truth based on prior teachings of the Church which cannot be rejected or denied and if that is darkness to you, then I feel sorry for you. You claim the lost aren’t attracted but you’d be surprised. I know a few converts from both the novus ordo and protestant religions and they are very good people who care. I pray that you one day become one even though your response at this time seems like you won’t. If we are blind and you are not, I dare you to prove your point by giving us some examples. You shouldn’t be shocked by our comments, but by what your pope and cardinals are doing and therefore you should do something about it but I guarantee you won’t accomplish anything while you remain in the novus ordo. They have their own agenda.

    • Pat

      “He [Satan] will set up a counter church which will be the ape of the Church, because he, the Devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the Antichrist that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. . . .But the twentieth century will join the counter church because it claims to be infallible when its visible head speaks ex cathedra.”
      (Fulton J. Sheen, Communism and the Conscience of the West, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1948, pp. 24-25)
      ************************************************************
      “The prophecies of the Apocalypse [book of Revelation] show that Satan will imitate the Church of Christ to deceive mankind; he will set up a church of Satan in opposition to the Church of Christ. Antichrist will assume the role of Messias; his prophet will act the part of Pope; and there will be imitations of the Sacraments of the Church. There will also be lying wonders in imitation of the miracles wrought in the Church.”
      (Rev. E. Sylvester Berry, The Church of Christ: An Apologetic and Dogmatic Treatise [St. Louis, MO: B. Herder Book Co., 1927], p. 119; italics given.)

      My dear blinded Vatican 2 friends, Having eyes, see ye not?

  13. BurningEagle

    The best thing for you to do is not visit this site anymore. Enjoy your balloons, tango dances, and having divorced and remarried couples next to you at the communion rail. Oops, I forgot you don”t have a communion rail. Well, in that case please give them all a warm hug from me when you do your kiss of peace.

  14. BurningEagle

    Jorge loves Schonborn. How can there be grave problems in the Immaculate Bride of Christ, the Roman Catholic Church? What could possibly need fixing after the reign of “Saint” John XXIII, “Blessed” Paul VI, “Venerable” John Paul I, “Saint” John Paul II, The “arch-conservative” Benedict XVI (who was one of the most liberal experts at Vatican II), and Jorge the Humble?

Leave a Reply