NOTE: This month's
archive is in the process of being expanded, as there were
significant recurring computer problems during the past several weeks. If you
have benefited from the website,
please help us finally resolve this
ongoing problem (click on the button at the right to make
a donation).
If you benefit from this web site, please...
Novus Ordo Watch is not responsible for, nor necessarily endorsing, the
content of linked web pages.
Links are mainly posted for educational purposes.
An
end to Conciliar 'nunsense'?
The Decay of Progressivist Women Religious
"A
nun in a full habit expresses her rejection of the fashions of the world
to follow Our Lord. Nonetheless, unlike these modern sisters, she does
not lose her femininity. In a certain way, it is enhanced, because her
way of being typifies what is most noble in women – purity, goodness,
warmth, generosity, refinement and self-sacrifice. This nobility of
spirit does not shine in the women we are seeing." NOW Comments: Marian T. Horvat, author of the above article, notes that the
radical Leadership
Conference of Women Religious is rapidly graying and on the way out,
whereas the more conservative
Council of Major
Superiors of Women Religious, a group started in protest of the LCWR
in 1992, has a younger membership and is growing. Nevertheless, she
warns:
I don’t think
that this conservative tendency is leading to an authentic return to
Tradition. By the fruits collected so far, it appears to be just
following the ‘reform of the reform’ pathway – with no outright
rejection of the errors of Vatican II, just a more conservative way
to present them.
So while the shift to a more "traditional" approach may seem encouraging
at first glance, it is, in a very real sense, more of
problem than the more overtly heterodox position, because, like the
Latin Mass motu proprio, it posits the false "solution" that Tradition
and Vatican II are compatible.
Yet abortion defender stays in
good standing
Pontifical Academy of Nonstop Fighting
"There's no rest for the president of the pontifical
academy for life, Archbishop Salvatore (Rino) Fisichella,… And it is the
latest chapter of a dispute that has been going on for almost a year,
since March 15, 2009, when
L'Osservatore Romano
published an article by Fisichella criticizing the Brazilian
archbishop of Recife for excommunicating the authors of a double
abortion for a child mother." (Left:
"Rino" Fisichella)
Related Links: Brazilian
'Archbishop' abandoned for
excommunicating abortion doctors
The Holy Office teaches Fisichella a lesson
NOW Comments:
It's instructive to read further, where we learn that "There were many
vigorous protests against the article and its author – who had written
it at the request and with the approval of cardinal secretary of state
Tarcisio Bertone – from the bishops of Brazil and of other countries,
and from dozens of members of the pontifical academy for life.…
" So it was Bertone who ordered and approved
Fisichella's article! And despite this involvement in defending a double
abortion, it's the same Bertone who just last month was praised and
retained by Benedict XVI as Modernist Rome's secretary of state. Later,
Benedict (who ironically was meeting with U.S. President Barack Hussein
Obama at the time) instructed a hastily-drawn "clarification" of the
article, but he has taken absolutely no action against
Fisichella,
who still heads the Pontifical Academy for Life (sic).
This is tantamount to approval, proof that defending "therapeutic"
abortion is an acceptable position in the occupied Vatican. Noteworthy
but not surprising for those who know the score.
More bad fruit from Vatican II
Once-Catholic Spain OKs liberal abortion law
"Spain on Wednesday approved a sweeping new law that eases restrictions
on abortion, declaring the practice a woman's right and doing away with
the threat of imprisonment, in part of a drive toward liberal policies
that has angered conservatives and the Catholic Church."
NOW Comments:
The Novus Ordo sect may be upset, but it must be remembered that it
brought this on itself when, after Vatican II, it pushed Spain and other
historically Catholic nations to secularize, renouncing any
constitutional connection between church and state. And this has been
the sorry result in nation after nation after nation…just as planned by
the enemies of God and man.
Paradoxical
Council critic
Abbé George de Nantes passes away
"In the early morning of February 15, the abbé Georges de Nantes fell
asleep in the Lord, fortified by the rites of the Church. He was one of
the earliest, fiercest public critics of the Second Vatican Council,
which he held to be a legitimate ecumenical council of the true Church,
endowed with the authority to teach dogmatically and infallibly. The
Council, he held, and with reason, finally declined to teach with that
level of authority. Therefore its teachings were not definitively
binding, and dissent from those teachings did not exclude a member of
the Faithful from communion with the Church.…"
NOW Comments:
When one considers the history of opposition to the robber council of
John XXIII/Paul VI, Abbé Georges de Nantes (1924-2010 - RIP) and his
Catholic Counter-Reformation group are seen to hold a place similar to
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X, The Remnant,
etc. in taking a stance sometimes referred to as recognize-and-resist,
meaning that one accepts the Council, the Novus Ordo Church, Popes and
Bishops all as legitimate Catholic authority, yet opposing whatever
teaching or actions are seen as contrary to the Faith. Like all the
rest, the Abbé arrived at this conclusion by making artificial
distinctions. For example, in his case Vatican II could and did teach
not just errors, but outright heresies (see "Principal Errors"
link above), yet still must be regarded as a legitimate council merely
because it was a "pastoral" council that didn't seek to teach
infallibly. Yet this is comparing apple and oranges, because whether or
not it sought to teach infallibly has no bearing whatsoever when it
comes to heresy; simply put, the teachings of a council, if it be truly
legitimate, are part of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church and
cannot contradict prior manifestations of the same Magisterium,
especially when the earlier Magisterium dogmatically and infallibly
ruled something to be either on the one hand a dogma of the Faith, or on
the other hand, a heresy. The authentic Magisterium of the Church cannot
and does not contradict itself, for if it did Catholics would have no
sure rule of Faith. The Abbé is perhaps best known for his three
Liberi Accusationis
(Books of Accusation―the above photo shows him in Rome with his book
against Paul VI), in which castigated the heresies and other errors of
Paul VI, John Paul II and the author of the so-called Catechism of the
Catholic Church ("Cardinal" Christoph Schönborn). Not surprisingly,
these works were ignored by Modernist Rome despite him journeying to the
Vatican to hand deliver them (Paul VI actually forbade him to set foot
in the Vatican and police were dispatched). Ironically, although the
Abbé mistook Benedict XVI as a restorer of Tradition, it was none other
than "Cardinal" Joseph Ratzinger at the Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith who in 1993 accepted, then totally ignored the Book of
Accusation against the false Catechism, despite it having had 267
co-signers. Paradoxically and sadly, the Abbé de Nantes never seemed to
realize that there was a reason for the total futility of his
well-intentioned efforts: He wasn't dealing with Catholics. While
praying for the repose of his soul, let us be grateful for the many good
writings he's left, but follow neither him nor the SSPX down the dead
ends they travel in their dealings with Modernists.
Collaboration, not conversion, is the goal
'Cardinal' George: Mormons, Catholics must defend religious liberty
"Speaking before a crowd of 12,000 at Brigham Young University, Cardinal
Francis George of Chicago delivered an address on 'Catholics and
Latter-day Saints: Partners in the Defense of Religious Freedom.'"
And the destruction continues…
Another California 'Catholic' school in trouble Cokie Roberts' book signing cancelled
Washington Times: Opus Dei rights itself
"Rev. Arne A. Panula, an Opus Dei priest who is director of the Catholic
Information Center in downtown Washington, deserves credit for canceling
the Cokie Roberts book signing scheduled for today. In a political city
filled with big egos and boastful bigwigs, it takes courage to admit a
mistake and correct it. That's what Father Panula did, and in so doing,
he showed true leadership and grit."
NOW Comments:
While it's good that Roberts wasn't allowed to do the signing, one is
permitted to doubt that there would have been the cancellation without
the public protest by
the
Times.
Also ringing hollow was Panula's alibi that the Center was "unaware that
some of the positions held by Ms. Cokie Roberts are inimical to the
Catholic Faith…" Prudence and common sense dictate that you don't invite
someone to your bookstore to hawk her new book unless you first
establish the fact that she doesn't hold such positions.
VIDEO/TEXT
Media confused by Biden's ashes, omits his Catholic heterodoxy
"Vice President Joseph Biden's very public wearing
of ashes, a Lenten practice for Catholics, on Wednesday led to several
befuddled reactions from the mainstream media. Sky News's Kay Burley had
to apologize after confusing the ashen mark for an injury.
"More egregiously, ABC News's Karen Travers
omitted the past controversy over his support for legalized abortion,
and portrayed him as a devout Catholic. The Vice President bore the
ashes on his forehead as he introduced President Obama at a White House
event celebrating the one-year anniversary of the so-called Recovery
Act.…"
More »
•When Arianism was defeated and rejected, a
“moderate” Semi-Arianism entered the picture to spread the same
errors in a milder version;
•When Pelagianism was rejected, a “conservative” Semi-Pelagianism
took its place;
•When Protestantism and Calvinism were unmasked, a “judicious”
Jansenism came;
•When Modernism was condemned, the same errors cautiously surfaced
20 years later under the name of Progressivism.
"Then, at Vatican II, Progressivism took over the entire
Church. Now, when public opinion is turning against those novelties,
there is no better thing for Progressivism than to repeat the same
strategy."
More
bait and switch from Benny
Vatican: No 'stable group' required for Latin Mass
"Good
news from Rome: the Vatican has further underlined the freedom of
priests to celebrate Mass in the Extraordinary Form whenever they
choose. Two important points have been clarified by Ecclesia Dei, which
will make it more difficult for the English, Welsh and above all
Scottish bishops to stall the implementation of Summorum Pontificum…"
NOW Comments:
What's the next in the shell game? Well, this looks really good for
those who think that
Summorum Pontificum
constitutes the beginning of the long-awaited restoration. The problem
is that anyone wishing to celebrate the Mass according to the 1962
Missal can't be a rogue, "have chalice, will travel" independent, but is
still obliged to function within the confines of the "diocese" to which
he's attached, which means he still needs to let the local "bishop" know
what he intends to do, as well as place and time. And that "bishop" can
still play hardball if he wants, because according to Benedict's
letter accompanying the motu "Each Bishop, in
fact, is the moderator of the liturgy in his own Diocese," which means
in the practical order of things that he can force a cleric
wishing to offer the Latin Mass to also say the "new Mass" (" in order
to experience full communion, the priests of the communities adhering to
the former usage cannot, as a matter of principle, exclude celebrating
according to the new books. The total exclusion of the new rite would
not in fact be consistent with the recognition of its value and
holiness"). Furthermore, Benedict stresses that "Nothing
is taken away, then, from the authority of the Bishop, whose role
remains that of being watchful that all is done in peace and serenity."
But what happens if the "bishop" deems that the Latin Mass people are
harming the "peace and serenity"? Then what? And this has already
happened in various "dioceses," so we're not just talking about a
hypothetical. And recall that this isn't the first time Modernist Rome
has seemingly intervened in a way that seemed to assure compliance of
the motu by the "bishops." It may very well prove not to be the last,
either. The result is to give the impression that there is a friend of
tradition sitting on the Chair of Peter whose wishes are being thwarted
by wayward "bishops." In the final analysis, this tension is greatly
desired, for Hegelian that he is, "Pope" Ratzinger sees a synthesis
coming out of the conflict between thesis and antithesis and that
synthesis is to result in the so-called "hybrid Mass," which will blend
elements of the true Mass and "new Mass" (see
here and
here).
Wants to be able to refuse treatment
Woman oppose 'bishops' on end-of-life issue Opus Dei hosts book by pro-abortion
talking head
"Local
Catholics are in an uproar because the Catholic Information Center is
hosting a book signing tomorrow for Cokie Roberts, a notorious dissenter
against Catholic moral teaching on abortion, birth control and
homosexuality. The TV commentator attacked the partial-birth abortion
ban as 'cynical game-playing' by pro-lifers and criticized Pope Benedict
XVI for 'lacking in the theological virtue of charity.'"
Infamy aided by 'bishop's' indifference
New findings cast increasing doubt on
Schiavo's death
"During my family's battle to save my sister Terri
Schiavo from death by dehydration, a tremendous amount
of debate raged over whether or not she was in what the medical
profession refers to as a persistent vegetative state (PVS).…
"I
was oftentimes rather astonished at the number of different and opposing
conclusions I heard from neurologists, physicians, speech therapists and
so many other medical professionals who tried to determine whether or
not Terri was in a PVS.
"This is why a recent study published by the New England Journal of
Medicine, regarding findings of awareness in patients previously
diagnosed in a PVS, may be one of the most important to date.…"
More »
NOW Comments:
Normally, Novus Ordo Watch only includes news that
directly pertains to some issue concerning the counterfeit Conciliar
Church. The case of Terri Schindler Schiavo, however, is one of those
few exceptions to the rule, given the immensity of the subject, but also
because there was a real tie-in with the Novus Ordo in terms of Terri's
betrayal by Florida's "Catholic" Governor Jeb Bush and "Bishop"
Robert Lynch,
resulted in her deliberate death by dehydration in 2005. Two years
later, Terri's brother, Bobby Schindler (above left), wrote a scathing
open letter
to Lynch, in which he rebuked the would-be ordinary for failing to come
to his sister's rescue in his time of need. In the letter Mr. Schindler
declared: "I hold you more accountable for her horrific death than
Michael
Schiavo, his attorney, and even the judge that ordered her to die." (
click
here
for entire letter) Lynch's betrayal went even beyond his tacit siding
with those seeking Terri's death, as he ordered clerics not to mention
her name from the pulpit or visit her. Despite this complete
indifference to the saving of a human life, Benedict XVI did not remove
Lynch, who to this day remains "bishop" in St. Petersburg, FL. Let's
pray that Bobby Schindler and others who were close to Terri see that
despite some pious platitudes that emanate from the Vatican about the
sanctity of life, Benedict's non-intervention concerning Lynch shows
that the evil in the Novus Ordo isn't confined to the Sunshine State.
Bobby continues to operate
Terri's Fight,
which appears to be growing stronger.
Irish 'bishops' meet with
Benedict XVI over child sexual abuse scandal
NOW Comments:
This is a clear indication of the influence of radical Jewish groups
on modern "Catholic" thought, because many Jews have a much higher
regard for Pius, who, far from being a symbolic of hatred of Jews, was
influential in protecting a huge number of them from the clutches of the
Nazis. Those who say the opposite are advancing a line of misinformation
and, arguably,
disinformation.
Roll
over, Palestrina?!
Vatican picks the Beatles and Oasis among its top
ten albums
"Choral music and canticles make up its normal
areas of interest but the Vatican has extended
its musical tastes to issue a list of the top ten pop and rock
albums of all time.…
L'Osservatore Romano
said the 10 albums were the perfect listening material for anyone
who found themselves marooned on a desert island."
NOW Comments:
It's amazing to observe how far the Vatican's official newspaper,
L'Osservatore Romano,
continues to go in finding novel ways to throw it's apostasy in it's
readers' faces. Over the past year or so it's given thumbs-up to
Obama, Marx, Darwin Calvin, and the latest
Harry Potter
film, to name a few of it's peculiar endorsements. The latest is
just as controversial, as it plays the role of pop music critic.
Among the subject matter of lyrics in covered in
L'Osservatore Romano's
Top Ten list are madness, greed, divorce, zombies, psychedelic drug
use, sexual promiscuity, an illegitimate child, a Hindu-based melody
and the Tibetan Book of the Dead. In other words, lots of morally
objectionable themes that don't happen to be treated from a
Christian standpoint.
Oh, and then there's the song that can easily be taken as an attack
on the Catholic Faith that's found in the paper's top-rated album,
the Beatle's Revolver. In one of music's first and most
famous examples of Baroque Pop, "Eleanor
Rigby," the group moved away from some of it's earlier
rock-oriented love songs and crafted a stark ballad of social
isolation and despair. The plaintive lead vocal by Paul McCartney
(right) and a grim classical-sounding string octet made for a
haunting hit record in the summer of 1966.
The song's title character is a lonely woman who ends up dying alone
and forgotten. The anti-Catholic element of the theme comes when the
second person is introduced:
Father McKenzie, writing the words
of a sermon that no one will hear
No one comes near
So, here's a priest who has his ministry in a dying church. The song
never exactly explains why "no one comes near, though later, after
Eleanor Rigby's death, we learn that her involvement in the church
was for naught:
Father McKenzie, wiping the dirt
From his hands as he walks from the grave
No one was saved
Again, we don't know why she wasn't saved: Was it because she died
in mortal sin or because the sacraments were of no value? Either way
it's hardly a spiritually edifying song, but one that breeds
pessimism.
Like many pop songs where the composers don't clearly state the
intent behind the lyrics, whether "Eleanor Rigby" was meant as an
attack on the Church, but there is circumstantial evidence that
points strongly in that direction.
In 1966 the Beatles were at the height of their considerable
popularity. Earlier that same year John Lennon (left), the group's
leader (along with McCartney),
took part in an interview where he uttered his infamous
"We're more popular than Jesus…"
remark. As is well know, that flippant statement cause a furor in
the United States, where some fans burned their Beatle records in
protest. In an effort to do damage
control, Lennon would later make a half-apology in which he said his
comment "was wrong. Or it was taken wrong." And with that the
controversy was put to rest for most people.
Unfortunately, when it came to Lennon's original quote in it's
entirety, he had "selective memory" and most people were ignorant of
it. And as it turns out, it was far more devastating than what most
knew about, as Lennon had declared:
"Christianity
will go. It will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue about that; I'm
right and I will be proved right. We're more popular than Jesus now;
I don't know which will go first-rock 'n' roll or Christianity.
Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. It's
them twisting it that ruins it for me."
So there is an open attack on the Church for "ruining" Christ's
teaching (note, too, that there's nothing approximating reverence
for our Lord, just that He was "all right." In later years, Lennon
became more openly hostile to anything Christian and openly denied
truths of the Faith and promoted Marxism in songs like "Imagine"
(his contributions to the advancement of the Communist cause are
such, that in 2000 the Castro government in Cuba opened
John Lennon Park
in Havana).
"Eleanor Rigby" was written primarily by McCartney with some help by
Lennon. It's of passing interest to note that McCartney is a fallen
away Catholic, who certainly had lost the Faith by 1966. (Actually,
a number of the Beatles' songs, such as "Lady Madonna," "Happiness
is a Warm Gun" and "The Ballad of John and Yoko" also took shots at
Catholic beliefs, but none at a more ground zero level than "Eleanor
Rigby," where salvation itself is questioned.) It speaks volumes
that
L'Osservatore Romano
would pick the Beatles' album containing such a song to praise so
highly , but by now it's something we've come to expect from that
source.
Vatican 'theologian': relics risk
superstition
New
Lenten color…green!
Carbon Fast Calendar
Looking for something to
give up for Lent? "The Archdiocese of
Washington Environmental Outreach
Committee lists 40 carbon fasting
actions everyone can consider as a part
of your Lenten preparation for the
Easter season." Only the Novus Ordo
would try to convince people that,
checking the air in car tires, bringing
a reusable bag to the store and turning
out the lights when leaving a room
qualify as mortifications! How much more
insane can it get?!
Is this the Novus Ordo's idea of a 'higher' calling?
Moving
closer towards a one-world 'ecumenical'
church
Kasper
advocates joint catechism with heretics
to 'prepare a new generation' "A Vatican official has floated the idea
of a shared 'ecumenical catechism' as
one of the potential fruits of 40 years
of dialogue among Catholics, Anglicans,
Lutherans, Methodists and members of the
Reformed churches.
"'We have affirmed our common foundation
in Jesus Christ and the Holy Trinity as
expressed in our common creed and in the
doctrine of the first ecumenical
councils,' Cardinal Walter Kasper,
president of the Pontifical Council for
Promoting Christian Unity, told
representatives of the churches.
"Opening a three-day symposium at the
Vatican to brainstorm on the future of
ecumenism, Cardinal Kasper said it is
essential 'to keep alive the memory of
our achievements' in dialogue, educate
the faithful about how much has been
accomplished and prepare a new
generation to carry on the work."
NOW Comments:
There's a profound irony in "Cardinal"
Kasper's recommendation for an
"ecumenical catechism." In 1562 at the
Council of Trent on a suggestion by St.
Charles Borromeo, the
Council Fathers passed a resolution
to "publish a formulary and method for
teaching the rudiments of the faith, to
be used by all legitimate pastors and
teachers." Pope Pius IV gave his
approval and assigned the supervision of
the project to eminent theologians of
the day. Today we know it most
often as the The Roman Catechism or
The Catechism of the Council of Trent.
(Due to it's ecclesiastical pedigree,
the Roman Catechism
"enjoys an authority equaled by no other
catechism" (the Conciliar Church would
want us to believe that the so-called
Catechism of the Catholic Church—more
accurately called the Catechism of
Vatican II—is of
equal or perhaps greater
footing, but the Vatican II Catechism
contain
grave errors,
which regardless of its orthodoxy in
other parts render it utterly worthless
as a instruction for Catholics and
clearly prove that it could not have
come from the highest authority in the
Church as it purports to do, since
according to the
dogma of indefectibility she cannot
change doctrines or impose laws that
would harmful to the faithful, else she would
defect.)
The ironic part of Kasper's call for an
"ecumenical catechism" is that according
to the
Catholic Encyclopedia
article cited above, the genesis of the
Roman Catechism grew in large part a
reaction to the followers of Luther,
Calvin and other Protestant "reformers,"
whose errors, disseminated in "popular
tracts and catechisms were flooding
every country and leading thousands of
souls away from the Church. The Fathers
of Trent, therefore, 'wishing to apply a
salutary remedy to this great and
pernicious evil,…'" deemed it necessary
to counter the heresies and other errors
being spread. So, similarly, to
then-"Cardinal" Joseph Ratzinger
speaking approvingly of the Vatican II
constitution,
Gaudium et spes,
as being a
counter-Syllabus, so Kasper has hit
upon an idea for a counter-Roman
Catechism of sorts, going beyond even
the Vatican II Catechism, since in this
one, with Protestant theologians
collaborating with their Novus Ordo
counterparts in putting this together,
there will be the equivalent of Luther
and Calvin sitting down side by side
with thoroughly orthodox Catholic
theologians to compose a catechism. (Of
course, this analogy only goes so far,
since Kasper and his theologians are
Catholic in name only.)
We hope there won't be any intellectual
dishonesty from the likes of Christopher
Ferrara and other "neo-trads" by trying
to spin this as a conflict between the
ultra-orthodox "Holy Father" and Walter
Kasper. As we've shown here on many
occasions, there is
no
conflict between the two, rather they're
operating from the same page of the
playbook. The most recent proof of that
was Benedict's January visit to Rome's
main synagogue, where he was accompanied
by Kasper. If there was a real riff
between them, and not one dreamt up in
Ferrara's fervid imagination, Kasper
would not still be running Pontifical
Council for Promoting Christian Unity,
as the "Pope" could have forced him into
retirement when he turned 75 in 2008.
Unless
one wants to buy into Ferrara's
ridiculous Vatican-against-the-Pope
fantasy, there is no way that Kasper
gets on Vatican radio or goes before an
"ecumenical" gathering as Benedict's
representative to hawk his counter-Roman
Catechism without the "Pontiff" knowing
about it. And if "Pope" Ratzinger knows
about it, there's no way he's going to
permit such a heretical proposal to
stand if he's the great champion of
orthodox that Ferrara pretends him to
be. No, this is a proposal done with the
full blessing of Ratzinger and it
constitutes a step in
"...the great movement of apostasy being
organized in every country for the
establishment of a One-World Church
which shall have neither dogmas, nor
hierarchy, neither discipline for the
mind, nor curb for the passions, and
which, under the pretext of freedom and
human dignity, would bring back to the
world (if such a Church could overcome)
the reign of legalized cunning and
force, and the oppression of the weak,
and of all those who toil and suffer."
--Pope Saint Pius X, "Our
Apostolic Mandate," 1910
What is represented above?
A ghost? A skull? A space alien?
No, none of the above. The answer may
come as a shock. Click below to find out…
What it is and why it matters
This page will be updated
with more information as time permits. Please consider
donating
to
this important cause if it is within your means. All for the Greater
Glory of God and the salvation of souls!
Looking for More? Check the Archived
News Pages, sorted by month and year:
Note:
Do to ongoing technical problems discussed
in the appeal letter and the appeal update, the archived pages for
February through May are in various stages of construction and will
be posted as soon as possible.
Please consider
donating to this important cause if it is within your means. All for
the Greater Glory of God and the salvation of souls!
Fair Use Notice:
This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may
not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of
political, human, religious, and social issues. We believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Yet abortion defender stays in
good standing
Paradoxical
Council critic
Accusationis
(Books of Accusation―the above photo shows him in Rome with his book
against Paul VI), in which castigated the heresies and other errors of
Paul VI, John Paul II and the author of the so-called Catechism of the
Catholic Church ("Cardinal" Christoph Schönborn). Not surprisingly,
these works were ignored by Modernist Rome despite him journeying to the
Vatican to hand deliver them (Paul VI actually forbade him to set foot
in the Vatican and police were dispatched). Ironically, although the
Abbé mistook Benedict XVI as a restorer of Tradition, it was none other
than "Cardinal" Joseph Ratzinger at the Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith who in 1993 accepted, then totally ignored the Book of
Accusation against the false Catechism, despite it having had 267
co-signers. Paradoxically and sadly, the Abbé de Nantes never seemed to
realize that there was a reason for the total futility of his
well-intentioned efforts: He wasn't dealing with Catholics. While
praying for the repose of his soul, let us be grateful for the many good
writings he's left, but follow neither him nor the SSPX down the dead
ends they travel in their dealings with Modernists.
VIDEO/TEXT 
More
bait and switch from Benny
Infamy aided by 'bishop's' indifference
Roll
over, Palestrina?!
Unless
one wants to buy into Ferrara's
ridiculous Vatican-against-the-Pope
fantasy, there is no way that Kasper
gets on Vatican radio or goes before an
"ecumenical" gathering as Benedict's
representative to hawk his counter-Roman
Catechism without the "Pontiff" knowing
about it. And if "Pope" Ratzinger knows
about it, there's no way he's going to
permit such a heretical proposal to
stand if he's the great champion of
orthodox that Ferrara pretends him to
be. No, this is a proposal done with the
full blessing of Ratzinger and it
constitutes a step in
