NOVUS ORDO WATCH

                             

EXPOSING THE VATICAN II PSEUDO-CATHOLIC CHURCH

"By their fruits you shall know them." ~ Matthew 7:16

 HOME I  ABOUT US I  NEWS & ARCHIVE I THE MASS / ECUMENISM I BENEDICT XVI I RESOURCES / FAQ I CONTACT

 

   SEARCH
   This Site


   Get Novus Ordo
   Watch GEAR


   Important
   QUOTES


   "WE HAVE
   BEEN WARNED"


   Make a
   DONATION


   Frequently-
   Asked
   QUESTIONS


   RECOMMEND
   this Site to a
   Friend


 

NEW UPDATES POSTED ON MAY 11
Help fight the good fight to defeat the Church of Darkness

 101 REASONS TO DONATE TO NOVUS ORDO WATCH
and  restore God's holy Catholic Church!

    Origin of the term "Church of Darkness," click here           •          About the photo, click here


Please help us in the
fight for Catholic Tradition

How online donations are secure
Learn about our pledge gift
 



 

 


'New Springtime' update
Novus Ordo report card: 1267 U.S. schools closed since 2000

 

NOW Comments:
The shaky economy may be a factor in some school closings, but there's way more to it than that. First, of course, there's the post-Vatican II shift away from using nuns as teachers, a change that is the consequence of the ever dwindling number of those in the religious life (the video is misleading in this respect it's almost as though they sought out one of the very few Novus Ordo schools left that still has sisters in habits teaching, to give the report a Catholic feel). While pre-Conciliar schools could keep tuition down because their faculty was comprised of teachers who had taken a vow of poverty, the schools of the counterfeit church now must typically pay salaries to lay teachers with families. Factor in the gigantic financial hit taken by "dioceses" as a result of settlements to clergy sex abuse cases, and it's clear that the Novus Ordo educational system is in utter shambles…just as planned.


CNN treats 'Fr.' Pfleger as less controversial than TV 'priest'
"Two Catholic priests who appeared as guests during back-to-back segments on Thursday’s No Bias, No Bull program were treated noticeably differently by CNN’s on-air personalities. Father Michael Pfleger of the Archdiocese of Chicago, who is best known for his racially-charged rhetoric against Hillary Clinton during the 2008 Democratic presidential race, as well as his defense of former Obama pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright, faced only a couple of pointed questions, most notably about his recent decision to fly an American flag upside-down. In the following segment, Father Mitch Pacwa of the orthodox Catholic TV network EWTN faced a more skeptical and sustained line of questioning from the CNN panel about the practice of priestly celibacy."

'Progressives' are good guys; bad guys are pro-Tradition
Vatican newspaper: 'Angels and Demons' is harmless entertainment
"The newly premiered movie 'Angels and Demons' is little more than 'harmless entertainment,' with many factual errors and little cultural value, according to the Vatican newspaper. Two dispassionate articles in L'Osservatore Romano May 7 may disappoint the film's promoters, who had sought a conflict with the Vatican of the type that surrounded 'The Da Vinci Code' in 2006. Both films are based on books by author Dan Brown."

Related Review:
 
Ron Howard's 'Demon' defense doesn't hold water

No kidding! When did you find out?
'Abp' Burke: Obama advancing anti-life, anti-family agenda
"A powerful Catholic leader on Friday accused President Barack Obama of pushing an anti-life, anti-family agenda and called Notre Dame's invitation for him to speak scandalous. Archbishop Raymond Burke, the first American to lead the Vatican supreme court, said Catholic universities should not give a platform, let alone honor, 'those who teach and act publicly against the moral law.'"

NOW Comments:
Really it's no fair of Burke to be singling out universities. If he wants to be heaping blame (and there's plenty to go around), he needs first to point the finger at his brother "bishops" at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, who gave voters the green light to cast their ballots for an Obama, and, then at New York's "Cardinal" Edward Egan, who invited the antichrist to the annual Al Smith Dinner (it was there that the egomaniacal candidate irreverently joked about his "Messianic" image, declaring: "
Contrary to the rumors you have heard, I was not born in a manger. I was actually born on Krypton and sent here by my father, Jor-el, to save the planet Earth."). But even more Burke should step out of his cushy Rome office and stroll down the hallway to read the riot act to his boss, Benedict XVI, who extended cordial congratulations to this proponent of infanticide at the time of Obama's inauguration. In the final analysis, these schools are simply following the example of the Novus Ordo hierarchy, which makes Burke's criticism quite hollow.


 videos/Text
Steamy beach pics land 'Fr. Oprah' In hot water
"Faithful supporters of Father Alberto Cutié have expressed shock and disbelief after photos of the celebrity priest in a Spanish language magazine showed him kissing and fondling a woman on Miami Beach, CBS Station WFOR-TV reports."


NOW Comments:
The scandal of "Fr." Cutié (pronounced koo-tee-AY) is a tough blow for the Conciliar Church. The cleancut, charismatic "priest" was a veritable poster boy for recruiting new seminarians. He's been the host of popular television and radio shows and a nationally syndicated columnist, where he would impart love and relationship advice much in the style of Oprah Winfrey. In other words, not using the opportunity in a way befitting a priest. A true Catholic priest would remind his audience of the supreme sacrifice Jesus Christ made for love of them and their need to reciprocate that love, of the Blessed Virgin's maternal care for us and the tender devotion we should have for so good a mother, of the importance of the Sacraments, of their obligations to God and neighbor, of the horror of sin and the Last Four Things, of the Social Kingship of Christ and war being waged against Him and His Church, and so on. None of that with "Fr. Oprah," whose pop psychology approach emphasizes how special and entitled to happiness people are, and what they need to do to empower their relationships. In another words, it focused on them and not God
sure, the Almighty is referenced along the way, even Christ's love for us, but only in passing, much like one would expect from Oprah or Obama. Cutié's advice provides little in the way of deep insights, rather just so many shallow, shopworn platitudes, about relationships, as seen in this interview and video clip from his program .

And yet by Novus Ordo standards he's considered to be very conservative, very much "by the book." While temptations of this sort are nothing new, of course, but dalliance with a bikinied divorcee illustrates much more than than just the fall from grace of a golden boy; it graphically exposes the moral, doctrinal and disciplinary bankruptcy at the heart of the counterfeit church for which he's employed. One can start with the malformation for the priesthood he received at seminary, in which Original Sin and its effects are for all intentions are ignored. So, despite what passed to many as his seeming orthodoxy, there is beneath it a doctrinal foundation of sand. Add the lack of much-needed graces in his doubtfully valid ordination and the "new Mass" he celebrates, and the weaknesses intensify. Oh, and then there's the South Florida factor. Catholics who had the misfortune to step into a Novus Ordo church near a beach can attest to seeing women  attending "Mass" in short shorts, halter tops or beach robes. This lack of modesty is no surprise. This is, after all, the Church of John Paul II and his "Theology of the Body," so the notion that one can not have chastity without decency is something that never dawns on them. And why should  it? No Original Sin, remember?  In other words, all the ingredients for disaster were there for the much fawned over Cutié. None of which excuses what he did, but it does put it in more perspective and perhaps mitigates it slightly (though he did take that vow of chastity). There soon will be another chapter in this sordid drama. It turns out that earlier in the year the popular "priest" revealed on his show his desire to marry and have a family. In other words, on the heels of this scandal no doubt there will be an renewed attack on celibacy and push for married clergy, possibly led by none other than the disgraced antihero, "Fr." Alberto Cutié. Count on it.


Meaningless move
Vermont abuse priest removed from priesthood by Vatican
"A former Roman Catholic priest who lives in Westfield and is accused of sexual abuse in Vermont, Indiana and eastern Massachusetts has been officially removed from the priesthood by the Vatican, according to church officials."
 

Background profile:

Rev. Edward O. Paquette

NOW Comments:
This is the sort of news that will thrill conservatives in the Novus Ordo Church. "See," they'll exclaim, "The Pope is really cracking down!" Yes, it looks like that, until you look at it in the proper context. To being with, Fr. Paquette is 81 years old, so it's not like he has an active ministry anyway. While it's true he could pose a problem if he gets near children, still, the chances of that are far more remote than with the scores of clergy half his age who are still involved in the daily affairs of churches. So this amounts to a token "defrocking."  Meanwhile, someone like "Cardinal" Bernard Law, not only isn't punished, but enjoys a cushy job in Modernist Rome, despite knowingly protecting notorious serial pedophiles like Frs. John Geoghan and Paul Shanley,
during his tenure as "Archbishop" of Boston. And there are many Bernard Laws out there, who still are in the good graces of "Pope" Ratzinger, but whose crimes merit swift justice. So in the end, Paquette's sacking is just so much smoke and mirrors, window dressing in the charnel house known as the Conciliar Church."

Notre Dame, are you listening?
Obama cuts prayer-day service
"President Obama is distancing himself from the National Day of Prayer by nixing a formal early morning service and not attending a large Catholic prayer breakfast the following morning."

NOW Comments:
This is hardly surprising, of course, considering who's involved. Obama's press secretary is quoted as saying that the President will pray privately as he does everyday. (But to which god? Baal, perhaps, who demanded infant sacrifice from his followers?). The message here shows that Obama prayer believes the role of prayer in the pubic life should be minimized, so his signing of the proclamation amounts to a formality. Again, not surprising coming from someone who cares little for religion, using it only as a political tool.
 

And The Remnant's huge omission
The Darwin delusion
"For more than a generation in the fourth century, the dogmatic teaching of the Council of Nicea on the divinity of Christ was misinterpreted and perverted so that the majority of Catholic bishops tolerated or taught a false Christology. Something similar is happening in our time in regard to the Magisterial teaching on creation. The dogmatic teaching on creation of the Fourth Lateran Council—as understood for 600 years by the foremost commentators of the Catholic Church, including Doctors of the Church like St. Lawrence of Brindisi—has been given a new, deviant interpretation so as to make it compatible with evolution. On the pretext that the natural sciences confirm the evolutionary hypothesis, the fundamental Catholic doctrines of creation and Original Sin have been set aside—in spite of the fact that breakthroughs in 21st century natural science have fully exposed the bankruptcy of the evolutionary hypothesis."


NOW Comments:
"Krao," the girl depicted in the poster as "the perfect specimen of the step between man and monkey," was exhibited in Britain and the United States in the late 1800s. Many in the public were duped into believing the hype, led by popular scientific magazines, including Scientific American, which described the child as an evolutionary throwback. In truth, she simply suffered from hypertrichosis universalis, a extremely rare condition in which a person's body is covered with hair. And far from being any sort of "missing link," she had above average intelligence and grew to be a well-read woman fluent in English, French and German.
(See National Geographic and the Stone Age swindle?) Krao joins a long list of "real" missing links down through the years, including such frauds as the Piltdown Man, that "true believers" in the pro-Darwin camp have latched onto, only to subsequently discard, as the final proof of the theory of evolution.

Given that the missing link is a linchpin for what was a standard hypothesis of this materialistic creed for decades
phyletic gradualism, this desperate search is understandable. The utter failure in this hunt for a transitional form led to some major revisionism in order to explain it away, most notably as Stephen Jay Gould's hypothesis of rapid change known as punctuated equilibrium, which handily asserts that no transitional forms exist per se. (See What's a Missing Link?)

Revisionism of a different sort was introduced in the Catholic Church over half a century ago when the Jesuit priest, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (a Vatican II muse) pushed his pantheistic theories of "Catholic" evolution and was indirectly condemned by Pope Pius XII in his 1950 encyclical,
Humani Generis, where he attacked "fictitious tenets of evolution which repudiate all that is absolute, firm and immutable."

Similarly, as Remnant correspondent Peter Wilders writes in "The Darwin Delusion," the Catholic Faith has been sabotaged by errors concerning the origins of man and the universe, introduced under the guise of natural science."  Wilders rightly salutes those Novus Ordo scientists who have taken a public stand against the errors in the form of conferences held in Rome, the most recent them occurring in Rome and entitled  “Scientific Critique of Evolution,” but what he doesn't say is just as important and is an omission in line with The Remnant's policy of being apologists for Benedict XVI, whom it ridiculously holds up as some champion of the Faith.

Specifically, Wilders doesn't explain why the “Scientific Critique of Evolution” conference took place (or if he did, it was edited out by publisher Michael Matt or one of his subordinates), a key detail that would fly in the face of The Remnant's calculated cover-up for "Pope" Ratzinger. The reason for the conference was because Modernist Rome (read Ratzinger) held a conference of it's own marking
are you ready for this?the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species, a key text advancing evolution by Charles Darwin (right, photo from about the time of the book's release).

One of the features of the Vatican-sponsored symposium was the zealous measures it took to keep out anti-evolutionists, whose objections to Darwinism would tend, shall we say, to dampen the festivities. In
fact, in one instance a doctor who dared challenge the lack of transitional forms was silenced, as can be seen here. In a report of the proceedings, we read that no sooner then the dissenter raise the issue: "Someone in the hall can be heard saying 'turn the microphone off…'”

How fitting that those words be heard at this Conciliar event, for it eerily echoes an infamous incident at Vatican II. Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani, Secretary of the Holy Office, spoke out in eloquent defense of the Traditional Latin Mass against what he saw as liturgical revolution. He spoke without notes and was so carried away with his subject that he exceeded the ten-minute limit on speeches. Rather then respect his position, which was second to the Pope, the revolutionaries ordered his microphone to be shut off, thus symbolically cutting off the voice of Catholic Tradition from being heard. Ratzinger, who was one of the suit-and-tie revolutionaries at the Council he defends to this day, did not say a word in defense of the anti-Darwinist.

But, then, why should he? After all, he was the one who okayed the Darwin love-in to begin with. That's understandable. What isn't understandable is why The Remnant, which fashions itself as a voice of Catholic Tradition, chose to completely pass over Benedict XVI's ties to the pro-evolutionist event.

Mealy-mouth excuses
Wuerl: Why I won't deny Pelosi communion
"[Wuerl's] beyond sorry to see Communion wielded as a weapon: 'That's the new way now to make your point. We never – the Church just didn't use Communion this way. It wasn't a part of the way we do things, and it wasn't a way we convinced Catholic politicians to appropriate the faith and live it and apply it; the challenge has always been to convince people.'' Whereas sanctioning them, in his view, has the opposite effect."

NOW Comments:
Wuerl's rationalization of his actions strikes out however one chooses to challenge them. New way to make a point? Well, if he's basing his argument solely on precedent that comes after Vatican II, perhaps, but since he ostensibly represents the Catholic Church, there has been a policy of withholding Holy Communion from unrepentant public sinners from the Church's inception, a policy that will endure until the Judgment Day. Of course, Wuerl doesn't see a politician's promotion of abortion through taxpayers' dollars as sin at all, but as an activity, however unpleasant, that isn't that much of a concern. What's a few more million slaughtered unborn babies? To Wuerl, apparently not something to be overly concerned about, certainly not enough to keep someone from receiving communion in the churches he oversees. True, we likely aren't talking about real Holy Communion (Wuerl was validly ordained in 1940, but exclusively says the doubtful "new Mass"), which eliminates the element of direct sacrilege, but the intent is nonetheless evil. Disgusting? Yes, but very telling, as well, about the kind of men Benedict XVI elevates to the highest posts in the Conciliar Church…elevates, and then allows to thrive at those posts regardless of what public scandals they may perpetrate.


Pro-life billboards denounce Obama's Notre Dame appearance

From
Christ or Chaos

Urbanely Accepting Evil
"One of the greatest triumphs of the devil is to convince human beings that he does not exist. The devil is deliriously happy when a human being denies his existence as he knows that such a person will be prone to fall into a life of unrepentant sin, sowing disorder and unhappiness and anger and rage against anyone and everyone who dares remind him (or her) that there is a God, that He has revealed Himself to His rational creatures solely through His Catholic Church, that we must obey His Commandments at all times as we strive to scale the heights of personal sanctity as His consecrated slaves through His Most Blessed Mother's Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart. This is why the devil has had a veritable field day in Modernity, which is founded on a rejection of these truths, and why this field day of his has been enhanced by the ethos of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism that operates on a de facto basis in a spirit of universal salvation that denigrates the horror of personal sin, including the Mortal Sins committed against the First Commandment by the conciliar 'pontiffs' as they have esteemed the symbols of false religions and dared to enter their places of false worship, each of which is 'sacred' only to the devil himself."


Wasn't the motu supposed to end these problems?
Rockville Centre Communion Scandal

 

NOW Comments:
Well, maybe the good padre could appeal to the Vatican about these communion in hand abuses. No, wait, Benedict gives communion in hand, too. Never mind!


Time to relax priest celibacy rules?

N.M. 'archbishop' seeks compromise on 'domestic partnerships' bill

Pro-life leaders concerned about pro-abortion article in Vatican's newspaper
"In recent weeks, pro-life Catholics from around the world have flooded Vatican offices with protests, petitions and letters asking for a retraction or clarification on an article published by L’Osservatore Romano implying that direct abortion could be morally justified or its evil mitigated in some 'extreme circumstances.'”

Related Article:

Vatican newspaper: Obama's first 100 days not all that bad

54% voted for him in November
Nearly half of 'Catholics' polled approve NDU honoring Obama

NOW Comments:
This is to be expected, since they supported his candidacy in a big way. Yet how is it Novus Ordo "bishops" are lining up to oppose Obama's Notre Da
me visit, when they themselves are the ones who gave the green light for voters to elect him. Let's spell it out in large letters: h-y-p-o-c-r-I-s-y.

 videos/Text  Service held in synagogue!
N.J. woman 'ordained as a priest' in controversial ceremony
"Last July, Mary Ann Schoettly was automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church after a ceremony that she says made her a deacon -- a ceremony conducted in willful defiance of her religion's ban on ordaining women. Today, in the eyes of a small group of renegade Catholics who believe women should be allowed into the Catholic priesthood, the 66-year-old Sussex County resident was ordained a priest, in a controversial ceremony held at a synagogue."

NOW Comments:
The ceremony was rightly condemned as a "pseudo-ordination" by Philadelphia's Novus Ordo "archbishop" (much like the ones he performs, though in a different sense, of course). Conservative members of the Conciliar Church will be quick to point out that when John Paul II in 1994 when he issued
the decree, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, he condemned the idea explicitly and definitively. Now while Novus Ordo Watch rejects Fr. Karol Wojtyla has being a valid pontiff, we will entertain the notion strictly for the sake of argument and state that there is nothing in that document that would raise it to the level of an infallible pronouncement, were he to have such authority. We bring this up for those people of goodwill who are still wrestling with the controversies surrounding Modernist Rome, but who have not yet been able to make a definite break with the counterfeit church. It is important for them to bear in mind that commencing with Vatican II, unquestioned teachings of the Catholic Church (such as the condemnation of ecumenism and religious liberty) were rejected and discarded as not in keeping with the times. Similarly, the exclusivity of ordination for men may one day be rejected and discarded for the same reason. The time is not yet considered opportune for such a radical move and we shouldn't expect it during Benedict XVI's reign, but there are plenty of signals within the Conciliar Church that it's simply a matter of time, as can be seen by the recent links below from Tradition in Action.

Preparing a Catholic priestess in Malaysia
More women participating at Masses in Brazil

The Novus Ordo Files
The Latest NEWS & ANALYSIS...


About this page

The revolution besieging the Catholic Church as a result of successful Modernist treachery that reached its culmination at the Second Vatican Council has now entered a new millennium and continues unimpeded in its destruction of souls. Despite the much-ballyhooed "new springtime" for the Church, the stark reality is not growth, but utter decay wherever one looks. What has emerged is a pseudo-Catholic Novus Ordo (Latin for "New Order") religion where the outer structures of the Church have been seized by men who long ago lost the Faith (or in some cases, never had it), along with hirelings who take a stand if it's fashionable and doesn't affect their pensions. While that counterfeit religion retains trappings of Catholicism, in substance it is as empty as its churches, seminaries and convents.

The purpose of this "News and Analysis" page to show not only that the destruction is both ongoing and global in its reach, but, even more importantly, that Modernist Rome is complicit in the havoc and has, through words and deeds that bespeak errors in morals and doctrine, established a veritable counter-magisterium. Thus the admonition our Lord cited at the top of the page is very apropos, indeed: "By their fruits you shall know them."
 

Exsurge Domine

Return to top

 


Tales from the Novus Ordo's Darkside
 



A young Beninese woman must be forcibly
restrained after being possessed by a voodoo god.
Yet, John Paul II praised the cultists for their beliefs.

Voodoo You Trust?
John Paul II's Betrayal in Benin

 


What is represented above?
A ghost? A skull? A space alien?
No, none of the above. The answer may
come as a shock. Click below to find out…

What it is and why it matters

 

PLEASE NOTE: Novus Ordo Watch is not responsible for, nor necessarily endorsing,
the content of externally-linked web pages or files. Links are mainly posted for educational purposes.
 



Fair Use Notice:
This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human, religious, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Fr more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 

This page is best viewed using INTERNET EXPLORER or MOZILLA FIREFOX.
(If you don't have one of these browsers, click an above link for free download.) 

Return to top
 


This page will be updated with more information as time permits. Please consider donating to this important cause if it is within your means. All for the Greater Glory of God and the salvation of souls!


Looking for More? Check the Archived News Pages,
sorted by month and year:

Note: Do to ongoing technical problems discussed in the appeal letter and the appeal update, the archived pages for February through May are in various stages of construction and will be posted as soon as possible.

2009: 01/09; 02/09; 03/09; 04/09;
2008: 01/08; 02/08; 03/08; 04/08; 05/08; 06/08; 07/08; 08/08; 09/08; 10/08; 11/08; 12/08

2007: 01/07; 02/07; 03/07; 04/07; 05/07; 06/07; 07/07; 08/07; 09/07; 10/07; 11/07; 12/07
2006:
01/06; 02/06; 03/06; 04/06; 05/06; 06/06; 07/06;
08/06; 09/06; 10/06; 11/06; 12/06
2005:
01/05; 02/05; 03/05; 04/05; 05/05; 06/05; 07/05; 08/05; 09/05; 10/05; 11/05; 12/05
2004:
01/04; 02/04; 03/04; 04/04; 05/04; 06/04; 07/04; 08/04;
09/04; 10/04; 11/04; 12/04
2003:
01-03/0304-05/03; 06/03; 07/03; 08/03; 09/03; 10/03; 11/03; 12/03

2002: 10-12/02

Return to top
 

Be notified when
this page is updated


it's private